[gmpi] Re: Drilling down into MIDI->GMPI conversion

  • From: Steve Harris <S.W.Harris@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
  • To: gmpi@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
  • Date: Wed, 23 Jun 2004 15:03:06 +0100

On Wed, Jun 23, 2004 at 03:55:21PM +0100, Martijn Sipkema wrote:
> > > I see MIDI automation as recording control data and not as recording
> > > plugin state.
> > 
> > So how does hte host makethateditable, or combine it with other control
> > data streams?
> 
> I don't understand the problem. If you mean that using both MIDI and
> some other protocol at the same time to control some parameter than
> I think it is to be expected that that will result in 'unexpected' behaviour 
> :).
> I don't think the host should (or can) do anything about that.

Thats only an issue if you insist on seperate, parallel control streams,
if you unify them (ala. Chris' suggestion) then this is no longer a
problem. Which is part of the reason for unification.

- Steve

----------------------------------------------------------------------
Generalized Music Plugin Interface (GMPI) public discussion list
Participation in this list is contingent upon your abiding by the
following rules:  Please stay on topic.  You are responsible for your own
words.  Please respect your fellow subscribers.  Please do not
redistribute anyone else's words without their permission.

Archive: //www.freelists.org/archives/gmpi
Email gmpi-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx w/ subject "unsubscribe" to unsubscribe

Other related posts: