[gmpi] Re: Decision Time: 7.1.1
- From: Tim Hockin <thockin@xxxxxxxxxx>
- To: gmpi@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Date: Tue, 10 Jun 2003 12:49:34 -0700 (PDT)
> "Support for interleaved audio buffers will be included
> if and only if,
> and only in cases where,
> sufficient net performance gains
> can be demonstrated."
> I'm in favor of the language quoted above. Who's with me?
I'm all for something like this. We need to remember that this is
requirements, not details.
7.1.1 Interleaving or Lack Thereof
----------------------------------
All hosts and plugins must support non-interleaved data for plugin I/O.
TBD: Based on as-yet-unknown benchmarks, the specification may be extended
to include a per-plugin preference for interleaved data. Should this be
added, the following additional issues must be resolved:
* Is the preference plugin-global (all ins/outs), context global
(all ins, all outs, or both), or per input/ouput?
* At what point of plugin existance is the preference acknowledged or
denied?
* When may the host change the format?
Does everyone accept this?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Generalized Music Plugin Interface (GMPI) public discussion list
Participation in this list is contingent upon your abiding by the
following rules: Please stay on topic. You are responsible for your own
words. Please respect your fellow subscribers. Please do not
redistribute anyone else's words without their permission.
Archive: //www.freelists.org/archives/gmpi
Email gmpi-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx w/ subject "unsubscribe" to unsubscribe
Other related posts:
