[gmpi] Re: [API] +++ RESET +++ (Parameter Grouping, metadata)

  • From: Steve Harris <S.W.Harris@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
  • To: gmpi@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
  • Date: Wed, 12 Feb 2003 09:16:24 +0000

On Wed, Feb 12, 2003 at 08:54:57 +0100, Urs Heckmann wrote:
> >Your buffer grouping thing sounds worthwhile, if it can be made simple
> >enough. Something equivalent for controls could be good too, eg. 
> >grouping
> >the (gain, Q, freq) of parametric eqs.
> Yeah, although it won't necessarily affect the process, it would be an 
> incredibly useful thing to have certain metadata for Parameters and 
> "how they are wired".

I am a big fan of metadata, and agree with what you said delow, but I'm
desperatly trying to keep from discussing this stuff until it comes up on
the Agenda :)

We have enough agenda items for now. Mr. chairman, can you declare
what the first topic is soon, so we can discuss it.

- Steve

Generalized Music Plugin Interface (GMPI) public discussion list
Participation in this list is contingent upon your abiding by the
following rules:  Please stay on topic.  You are responsible for your own
words.  Please respect your fellow subscribers.  Please do not
redistribute anyone else's words without their permission.

Archive: //www.freelists.org/archives/gmpi
Email gmpi-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx w/ subject "unsubscribe" to unsubscribe

Other related posts: