[gmpi] Re: 3.8. Events Req 25 eventorder
- From: Tim Hockin <thockin@xxxxxxxxxx>
- To: gmpi@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Date: Tue, 18 Jan 2005 09:49:17 -0800
On Tue, Jan 18, 2005 at 06:12:28PM +0100, Robert Fehse wrote:
> eventlist->sortByTimeStampNoteOffBeforeNoteOn();
Something like that, except with a sane API :)
> > And I think that it makes sense to say that events are sorted in timestamp
> > order, with events for the same timestamp sorted by the order received.
>
> ok, but cases like i described (loop border events) should described also in
> detail because there is no receive order if the user has drawn a note in the
> sequencer, here the host simply must follow the rules GMPI gives (so there
> should be exact rules).
The entity that is sending the events is responsible to send events. So
it should send an off before an on. Or better, it should send a restart,
if we have such a thing.
> btw.: is the intention to pass the list by reference and declaring it valid
> for the following process loop (like vst) ?
Something like that sounds reasonable to me.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Generalized Music Plugin Interface (GMPI) public discussion list
Participation in this list is contingent upon your abiding by the
following rules: Please stay on topic. You are responsible for your own
words. Please respect your fellow subscribers. Please do not
redistribute anyone else's words without their permission.
Archive: //www.freelists.org/archives/gmpi
Email gmpi-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx w/ subject "unsubscribe" to unsubscribe
Other related posts:
