[gmpi] Re: 3.14 UIs
- From: Paul Davis <paul@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- To: gmpi@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Date: Sun, 06 Jun 2004 21:25:40 -0400
>Steve said:
>>Jeff wrote:
>> > So, while I 100% agree that OSC is a great choice. It's not up to the
>> GMPI
>>> spec to say.
>>
>>Its not much a plugin standard if each UI only works with one host.
>>
>>- Steve
>
>Can you spell out your logic here? 'Cuz I'm not seeing how your
>question follows from Jeff's statement, it seems more like a
>criticism of not having a crossplat GUI toolkit than like support for
>your position that OSC's the only reasonable protocol for
>host<-->remote GUI host communication.
that was actually my position.
Not sure, but maybe you're
>thinking a generic auto-constructed OSC GUI is good enough for the
>remote UI? If so, I'd disagree.
i don't think that was steve's point at all.
the issue is not how the GUI was constructed. the issue is how the
proposed "remote GUI (mini) host" communicates with the host running
the DSP. the GUI can be written in klingon to run on Plan 9 from Outer
Space for all i care ... if the remote GUI (mini) host for that
platform uses OSC (or some other defined protocol) to communicate with
the host running the DSP, everything is good.
--p
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Generalized Music Plugin Interface (GMPI) public discussion list
Participation in this list is contingent upon your abiding by the
following rules: Please stay on topic. You are responsible for your own
words. Please respect your fellow subscribers. Please do not
redistribute anyone else's words without their permission.
Archive: //www.freelists.org/archives/gmpi
Email gmpi-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx w/ subject "unsubscribe" to unsubscribe
Other related posts:
