On Mon, Jun 07, 2004 at 06:19:03 -0700, Tim Hockin wrote: > > That's one solution. I'm just trying to point out that it is > > technically inferior to a solution that includes a documented protocol > > for driving *any* compliant plugin from *any* compliant UI. > > That's ideal, sure, but we're broadening our scope, too. GMPI is going to > step on a lot of toes. This is one more... Its not a broadening of scope, its just definig a UI comms protocol instead of an API. Its less work (for everyone) and its more general, I just dont see the problem. - Steve ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Generalized Music Plugin Interface (GMPI) public discussion list Participation in this list is contingent upon your abiding by the following rules: Please stay on topic. You are responsible for your own words. Please respect your fellow subscribers. Please do not redistribute anyone else's words without their permission. Archive: //www.freelists.org/archives/gmpi Email gmpi-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx w/ subject "unsubscribe" to unsubscribe