[gmpi] Re: 3.11 topic: Inter-parameter linkages
- From: Tim Hockin <thockin@xxxxxxxxxx>
- To: gmpi@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Date: Tue, 13 Apr 2004 14:33:57 -0700
On Tue, Apr 13, 2004 at 06:33:37PM +0100, Steve Harris wrote:
> > No, just send back a change notification to the clipped value.
>
> That is a horribly inelegant colution - think of the implications on using
> a graphical UI, plus theres no hint to the user that that range has
> changed.
I don't see a clean way to do parameter clipping without making another
level of dynamism on top of parameters. The ideal would be that the GUI
knob would just stop rotating at a certain point, until the clip was
resolved. Making it go past the clip then come back after some latency DOES
suck.
A custom GUI can probably provide the ideal behavior, but a motorized fader
or an LED-encircled endless rotary encode has the latency problem.
I think we're travelling down a rat-hole and we need to punt on some of the
details. How can we characterize this all as reqs?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Generalized Music Plugin Interface (GMPI) public discussion list
Participation in this list is contingent upon your abiding by the
following rules: Please stay on topic. You are responsible for your own
words. Please respect your fellow subscribers. Please do not
redistribute anyone else's words without their permission.
Archive: //www.freelists.org/archives/gmpi
Email gmpi-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx w/ subject "unsubscribe" to unsubscribe
Other related posts:
