I think that using different namespaces for each plugin is good, because name clashes between them could theoretically happen (probably with plugins that have dependencies) and would be a little annoying to walk around. K > Hi Kuba, > yes it seems that we have no (or weak) system in namespaces. Feel > free to create some. In my opinion, we don't need nested namespaces, > but if you wish, do it that way. > > T. > > > ------------ Původní zpráva ------------ > > Od: Cestmir Houska <czestmyr@xxxxxxxxx> > > Předmět: [glideplan_swproj] Re: Plugin namespaces > > Datum: 04.2.2012 12:56:35 > > ---------------------------------------- > > Good Idea. Maybe Updraft:: would suffice? > > > > Cestmir > > > > On Fri, Feb 3, 2012 at 7:57 PM, Kuba Marek <blue.cube@xxxxxxxxx> > > wrote: > > > Hi, > > > currently the namespaces used by plugins are pretty messy. > > > igcviewer uses Updraft::Core, turnpoints use only Updraft ... > > > what about changing it all to Updraft::PluginName ? > > > > > > K > > > > To visit archive or unsubscribe, follow: > > //www.freelists.org/list/glideplan_swproj > > > > > > > > To visit archive or unsubscribe, follow: > //www.freelists.org/list/glideplan_swproj