[glideplan_swproj] Re: CoreInterface name

  • From: Kuba Marek <blue.cube@xxxxxxxxx>
  • To: glideplan_swproj@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
  • Date: Wed, 23 Nov 2011 20:50:32 +0100

> Hi all!
> I wonder if we should not change the name of the core interface class,
> because it is not an interface in the object-oriented sense of the
> word (whereas on the other hand the PluginInterface class is really an
> interface). I propose CoreAPI. Yeah, there's interface in the acronym
> as well, but it's not ambiguous anymore.
> Cestmir

It's not an api either, only part of an api. Coreinterface was IMHO more
fitting name ... not that it matters (as long as the name doesn't
change while we're using it).

Other related posts: