Russia – USA: Global Peace Cooperation instead Nuclear War Deadly for Humanity
– What is your position? +++ Without Russia, where would we have been? Johan
Galtung (GPS, p.425-426).This is the most positive agenda for the surviving of
humankind.
I suggest to modify the following points
7. Scientific basis for nuclear disarmament up to global "nuclear zero" during
10 years.
8. Scientific basis of the Earth Constitution as a Global Peace Constitution:
the highest instrument of international law.
as
7. Scientific basis for nuclear disarmament up to global "nuclear zero"
immediately
8. Scientific basis of the Earth Constitution as a Global Peace Constitution:
the highest instrument of international law as a First step for a global peace
accord based on harmonic agreements, compromises, obligations, control and
vigilance.
Prof. Emeritus Dr. Ernesto Kahan MD University Professor - Poet – Physician
Tel Aviv University, Israel.
Academician - Real European Academy of Doctors
Academician - International Academy of Sciences, Technology, Education and
Humanities (AICTEH) - Spain
1st Vice President - World Academy of Arts and Culture – WAAC/WCP
Former Vice President of IPPNW (Association awarded the Nobel Peace Prize) and
the actual president of the Israeli Branch
Albert Schweitzer Peace Award
Honorary President of SIPEA – International Society of Poets Writers and Artists
Israel President. Global Harmony Association (GHA)
From: Leo Semashko
Sent: Saturday, September 3, 2016 6:30 AM
To: Global Harmony Association ; gha@xxxxxxxxxxxxx ; ghausa@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Cc: gha-peace-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx ; iaewp.org@xxxxxxxxx
Subject: [gha-peace] Russia – USA: Global Peace Cooperation instead Nuclear War
Deadly for Humanity – What is your position? +++ Without Russia, where would we
have been? Johan Galtung (GPS, p.425-426).
Dear Peacemakers, who did not respond to the threat of nuclear war and has not
expressed his position to its alternative,
In the face of the 100% prepared USA/NATO’s nuclear aggression/war (WWIII) on
the western border of Russia, we invite you to support as its alternative our
project "Russia – USA: Global Peace Cooperation, Dialog and Partnership instead
Nuclear War Deadly for Humanity" that is summarized by the USA-Russia Summit
Agenda at 10 points, below:
Russia – USA:
Global Peace Cooperation, Dialog and Partnership instead Nuclear War
Deadly for Humanity.
Global Peace Summit of two states.
"Mankind must put an end to war, or war will put an end to mankind." John F.
Kennedy
Agenda. (Draft)
1. Social cosmos of global peace. Its objective pillars: Spheres, Laws and
Actors of World Harmony.
2. Global Peace Science (GPS): Researches of its objective pillars, scientific
peace geopolitics and pacifization of international relations.
3. The right of humanity and every person to life, to peace and to freedom from
war, especially from nuclear annihilation and from its threats from any state.
4. Joint Institute of GPS with offices in Russia and the United States to
explore the objective pillars of global peace and substantiation of humanity
right to life.
5. International Scientific Contest for the best variant of GPS under the UN
and both states aegis.
6. Scientific technologies of pacifization and peace geopolitics in the social,
economic, environmental, cultural and organizational spheres/fields.
7. Scientific basis for nuclear disarmament up to global "nuclear zero" during
10 years.
8. Scientific basis of the Earth Constitution as a Global Peace Constitution:
the highest instrument of international law.
9. Global disarmament for 50 years based on GPS.
10. Scientific rearrangement the global power (including the UN) architecture
and building a multipolar world order, ensuring global peace since the 21st
century end.
CONCLUSION. Similar Global Peace Summit Agenda sums up the Program of
peace cooperation between Russia and the United States.
CALL. We invite the critics to offer the alternative Program/Agenda of
Russia and the US cooperation for scientific comparison and discussion. Read
more: http://peacefromharmony.org/?cat=en_c&key=710 ;
You could edit this Agenda, which will be presented to the Governments of two
states, as well as the UN, UNESCO and other peace organizations. Could we hope
for your support of every as a peacemaker?
The Agenda of peacemaking cooperation between the two nuclear superpowers, in
whose hands are the life and death of humanity, including you, your children
and your grandchildren, me, my children and grandchildren, and every person on
Earth is a key nonviolent tool to overcome their nuclear standoff. Could you
offer another alternative? If yes, please, let us know it. But if no and you
silently ignore our alternative, how we should to understand your silence? ...
HOW??? Or are you no longer Peacemakers? Or who are you .....????
Please, let us know it. Thank you for your response.
Sincerely,
Dr. Leo Semashko,
GHA Honorary President,
-State Councillor of St. Petersburg, Russia;
-Philosopher, Sociologist and Peacemaker from Harmony; -Global Harmony
Association (GHA) Founder (2005) and Honorary President (2016);
-Director, GHA Website "Peace from Harmony": www.peacefromharmony.org;
-Global Peace Science (GPS) from Harmony (616 pages):
www.peacefromharmony.org/?cat=en_c&key=585;
-SPHERONS as GPS Center (20 pages):
http://peacefromharmony.org/?cat=en_c&key=423;
-NO TO USA WAR WITH RUSSIA:
http://diy.rootsaction.org/petitions/no-to-war-hot-or-cold-with-russia;
-Personal page: http://peacefromharmony.org/?cat=en_c&key=253
-Video: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1tNPQk-StY4
"The roots of wars grow out of military science (mind). The roots of
peace grow out of Global Peace Science (mind) and harmony of
SPHERONS". -- Leo Semashko
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
6. The West against Itself. Without Russia, Where Would We Have Been?
Johan Galtung
(Global Peace Science, p. 425-426:
http://peacefromharmony.org/docs/global-peace-science-2016.pdf ;)
Jondal, Bergen, Kristiansund: The West – North America and Europe to somewhere
in Mexico and Ukraine, declines, outcompeted economically, defeated militarily,
confronted politically, contested culturally. But still strong on all four,
with much to offer in a more egalitarian world. No need to fall further by
working against itself.
Take the 70th anniversary demarcation of the victory over nazism, take
thousands of Africans drowning in the waters around Lampedusa, Italy, take the
Islamic State, take Ukraine – and a country up there in the high North of
Europe, Norway. Elections have moved the country from "red-green" to
"blue-blue" coloring of the same color blind foreign policy: follow Washington,
Our Father, lest Satan should come.
Yes, the Red Army came and liberated Kirkenes 25 October 1944, the northernmost
city. Everybody knows Operation Barbarossa, Hitler's three-pronged attack
toward Leningrad (the siege), Moscow (to beat Napoleon?) and Caucasus (oil);
but not the war for the ice-free harbor of Murmansk, from Kirkenes. King Haakon
VII, a Dane elected king in 1905, made a remarkable speech in London,
distributed from the air: "Fear of Russians is not a recent phenomenon.– New
was the fear of bolshevism, added after the Russian revolution. But up till
this date we are missing the slightest proof that Russia has had aggressive
designs on Norway. What we are not missing are the proofs that the fear of
Russians and bolshevism is propagated by powers and groups that themselves had
aggressive designs on Russia. The proofs are abundant in the political history
from 1918 till today."
Poland lost 20% of its population; the Soviet Union 27.1 million, 16%, with
1710 cities and 70,000 villages erased; UK 1.1%; USA 0.4%; Norway 0.32%. The
Soviet Union may have lost more soldiers close to Kirkenes against nazism than
Norway all over Norway during the war.
True, the present King, Harald, expressed gratitude last October. But 9 May is
about the whole war: travel to Moscow, King Harald, in the spirit of your
grandfather. Problems can be discussed the day after. However, even if Article
5 in the new Norwegian Constitution defines the King or Queen as "holy", Harald
may not be permitted by the multicolored consensus ballad "above political
parties", choreographed by the US embassy in Oslo. A chance for peace lost.
Take the Islamic state: Norway is sending 120 soldiers – with the consent of
the "greens" – slated to train forces against IS. No word about using military
only defensively, protecting threatened victims of IS (they are many). Kill one
IS, reap 10 new. Consider this.
Norway has more severe problems than declining oil revenues: bullying at work,
inability to handle conflict is transformed into medical problems and insurance
claims to become, in fact, unemployed. The country is rich enough so far to
pay. Add loneliness, look at the movie OSLO, and understand why so many
Norwegians, and many, many more French, convert to an Islam offering
togetherness and sharing instead. And then they experience their own country
thoughtlessly, as kneejerk reflex, attacking the source of their own new
salvation. And the front against Islam becomes an ice front, also inside the
West.
Take Ukraine. Like for the Islamic state the knowledge of detail is minimal.
But there is a compass to go by, religion: Judaism with Catholicism with
Protestantism on one side, ours; against Orthodox Christianity and Islam, maybe
Hinduism-Buddhism, for sure Chinese civilization whatever that may be; lost in
all that Eastern mist. This position, that stands, has been prescribed well in
advance. From 395 for Ukraine, by those who divided the Roman Empire in a
Catholic and an Orthodox part ("universal" and "right faith", not very modest).
East of that border running through Ukraine is the wrong Christianity, the
wrong alphabet, the wrong location.
From 622 for Islam, by those denying Christ's divinity: the wrong faith, even
stranger alphabets, too far away, and dangerously close. Washington, with its
geopolitical designs, has an easy job in Oslo. All badly handled, pushing
others away by the deep culture of religion-history and simple geography, by
lack of consciousness, lack of work to know, feel, and understand, by no
empathy. Norway is among the worst, embracing Obama and rejecting Putin more
than any other country according to a recent Gallup poll. Extreme ignorance
goes well with extremist positioning; pushing neighbors away, embracing the
Father substitute in Washington. "Fader Vеr, Du som bor i Washington".
Take Lampedusa; a symbolic word – for what? Superficially for thousands of
ecological-economic-political refugees. Deeper down much much more: a giant
Vulkerwanderung, people, peoples, on the move for decades, centuries; colonized
peoples seeking protection in "mother countries"; exploited peoples taking
revenge – you occupied us, now it is our turn. Actually, all of the above. Rich
Norway's offer? One ship, "before August 1". Maxi problem, mini answer.
There is a solution. Encourage, help the African Union effort to emulate the
European Union: common currency for Africa, an African (not "World" – W =
Washington) Bank, an African (not "International"-I = Inside the Beltway)
Development or Monetary Fund. In short, exactly what Gaddafi tried. The Western
kneejerk was bombing, killing. And who killed most? Norway, with the
"socialist", "leftist" party.
Continue along these lines. Each stupid move not only drives what is East and
South of West closer together in Eurasia; by itself not bad. Bad is a
USA-EU/Eurasia ice front dividing a world possibly globalizing on a reasonably
egalitarian basis, not on West = universal.
Forget millions of Russians who died to defeat Napoleon; without that no Kiel
Treaty 18 January 1814, no Norwegian independence 17 May. Forget 27 million
Russians who died to defeat Hitler. 9 of 10 German soldiers died on the Eastern
front where 2/3 of them were fighting. Without Russia, where would we have
been? Continue, and make the West fall further. It deserves better.
27-04-2015. https://www.transcend.org/tms/2015/04/the-west-against-itself/ ;
Dr. Johan Galtung (b. 1930) professor of peace studies is a Norwegian
sociologist, mathematician and the principal founder of the discipline of peace
and conflict studies. Germany.
