That's pretty good, Paul. Yet another way of seeing it, that I hadn't thought of. Thanks! Kind regards, Regner - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Quoting Paul Deema <paul_deema@xxxxxxxxxxx>: > Greetings interested parties! > Comments in this colour > From j a Wed Nov 14 20:45:30 2007 > What Paul is saying is the same thing I've been trying to get across. An > ally! When attempting to record an annual trail; as the camera moves to the > next photo op it also gets tilted by the rotation on the nightly axis. > Tilting the camera for the next photo alters where any particular star will > fall on the photo plate. Surley you must see how altering the camera angle > while collecting for a single trail (whether nightly or annual) would alter > the trail? > From j a Wed Nov 14 21:49:52 2007 > Didn't we determine that 23'56" was the proper time to record the annual star > trail and that at 24hours we would not record a star trail? NO 24 hours > exposures.. Sorry -- this time Allen got it right! > From Allen Daves Wed Nov 14 23:43:00 2007 > I think I understand what you are getting at now..?...........Allen! Can I > truly stop trying now? > > Well I've got a picture for you all anyway. Please tell me if you don't > understand this. > Paul D > > > Make the switch to the world's best email. Get the new Yahoo!7 Mail > now. http://au.yahoo.com/worldsbestmail/viagra/index.html > >