[geocentrism] Re: translational motion of the earth......

  • From: Regner Trampedach <art@xxxxxxxxxx>
  • To: geocentrism@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
  • Date: Fri, 16 Nov 2007 10:10:41 +1100

That's pretty good, Paul.
Yet another way of seeing it, that I hadn't thought of.
Thanks!

    Kind regards,

       Regner

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -


Quoting Paul Deema <paul_deema@xxxxxxxxxxx>:

> Greetings interested parties!
> Comments in this colour
> From j a Wed Nov 14 20:45:30 2007
> What Paul is saying is the same thing I've been trying to get across. An
> ally! When attempting to record an annual trail; as the camera moves to the
> next photo op it also gets tilted by the rotation on the nightly axis.
> Tilting the camera for the next photo alters where any particular star will
> fall on the photo plate. Surley you must see how altering the camera angle
> while collecting for a single trail (whether nightly or annual) would alter
> the trail?
> From j a Wed Nov 14 21:49:52 2007
> Didn't we determine that 23'56" was the proper time to record the annual star
> trail and that at 24hours we would not record a star trail? NO 24 hours
> exposures.. Sorry -- this time Allen got it right!
> From Allen Daves Wed Nov 14 23:43:00 2007
> I think I understand what you are getting at now..?...........Allen! Can I
> truly stop trying now?
>  
> Well I've got a picture for you all anyway. Please tell me if you don't
> understand this.
> Paul D
> 
> 
>       Make the switch to the world's best email. Get the new Yahoo!7 Mail
> now. http://au.yahoo.com/worldsbestmail/viagra/index.html
> 
> 


Other related posts: