[geocentrism] Re: motor
- From: "Robert Bennett" <robert.bennett@xxxxxxx>
- To: <geocentrism@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Tue, 17 Jul 2007 10:28:54 -0400
Robert B, as regards your Aspden-Adams motor, if I recall correctly, you
stated that the motor if restarted within a minute or two of stopped, it
would return to full speed using less input power than the original start
from a long dead stop, in either direction.
Thats a bummer! Its means we have a rotating force residual that acts in
both directions, which is a contradiction in mechanical terms.
It contradicts angular momentum , but not energy, since energy is not
directional(a vector) . Maybe a property of the aether is that it
stores/absorbs rotational energy temporarily. It has no inertia because it
is the source/cause of inertia.
If the Aspden capacitor I am currently considering has the electrical
effect of opposite rotation of charges in the aether surrounding the motor
rotor, it becomes a conditional response related to how the aether affects
motion, (of the flywheel) rather than any normal electrical or magnetic
reaction.
Meaning: Maybe the effect could be tested by using a second motor drive
mechanically connected to the first, to bring the first rotor (motor) back
up to speed. This might help establish if it is purely a mechanical
property. One could look at the generator action in the first motor as well.
As we are dealing with permanent motors, I can assume this will generate if
driven.
These are all good ideas to test the aether properties. Remember I suggested
relocating the motor before the second start, to see if the Aspden effect is
limited in space as well as time. I would guess yes. If so, what distance
causes the Aspden effect to disappear?
I would rather see you (or anyone else) validate and then extend the Adams
motor aether properties- than test the rotating charge capacitor.
RB
Philip.
Other related posts:
