[geocentrism] Re: half a photon
- From: Robert Bennett <robert.bennett@xxxxxxx>
- To: geocentrism@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Date: Fri, 03 Aug 2007 21:05:40 -0400
They used to call light a wavicle.
Here's a photon model you should be familiar with(especially since Ph.
stands for Philip)
Ph.M. Kanarev, "Photon Model", Galilean Electrodynamics 14, Spec.Iss., 3-7
(2003).
also
http://www.journaloftheoretics.com/Articles/4-1/Kanarev-photon-final.pdf
Would give the reference to the CSS photon model - which is similar - but
can't find it on-line.
RB
However, having said that even MS would not argue the fact that EMR is
bent Via what they call "Gravity" Allen
Allen, that was not proven. the long awaited measurement of light past a
large planet, was inconclusive, yet the followers of Einstein needing this
proof do accept it . They need to prove their theory that EMR is corpuscular
particles, and equivalent to mass.. to avoid the need of an aether of course
to explain the wave theory of propagation.. They are waves, this cannot be
disproven, however much denied. They want to call it waves of
energy/matter????
What happens when they get down to a single photon? (gaps in between?) Oh
no, then we will have half a photon, or is it a stretched photon.. There
cannot be any gaps in a wave...
Philip.
Other related posts:
