[geocentrism] Re: excuse my paranoia

  • From: Neville Jones <njones@xxxxxxxxx>
  • To: geocentrism@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
  • Date: Thu, 27 Sep 2007 06:16:32 -0800

Dear Philip,

I agree with Jack that organic evolution is not a viable alternative to creation. Not in any way, shape or form.

However, I want to pick up on the second thing you said, "the world has existed no more than 10,000 years and probably less." Are you questioning the Genesis record that allows us to estimate ~6,000 years for the age of the universe?

In relation to this, I recall that someone resigned from ICR because of the ages of some trees, as determined from their growth rings. Does anyone else remember this and, if so, can they supply some meat on the bones, please?

Neville
www.GeocentricUniverse.com


-----Original Message-----
From: jack.lewis@xxxxxxxxxxxx
Sent: Thu, 27 Sep 2007 12:50:20 +0100

Dear Philip,
Of course I'm biased, but not against true science.
 
I don't understand your comment below. Your sure its a viable alternative? It's not a viable alternative! If it were there would be no point in discussing it!
 
Jack 
----- Original Message -----

Not me. I am absolutely certain that evolution is a viable alternative as to how we arrived today. I just happen to know with certainty that it did not happen that way, and that the world has existed no more than 10,000 years and probably less.
 
Get Free 5GB Email – Check out spam free email with many cool features!
Visit http://www.inbox.com/email to find out more!

Other related posts:

  1. Home
  2. geocentrism
  3. Archive
  4. 09-2007