[geocentrism] Re: excuse my paranoia

  • From: "philip madsen" <pma15027@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
  • To: <geocentrism@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
  • Date: Fri, 28 Sep 2007 09:17:30 +1000

catalepsy  noun [U]
a medical condition in which a person's body becomes stiff and stops moving, as 
if dead

Also heart and respiration rates become almost undetectable, and under hypnosis 
strictly controlled. 

couldn't remember the word earlier.. Philip. 
  ----- Original Message ----- 
  From: philip madsen 
  To: geocentrism@xxxxxxxxxxxxx 
  Sent: Friday, September 28, 2007 8:11 AM
  Subject: [geocentrism] Re: excuse my paranoia


  I don't understand your comment below. Your sure its a viable alternative? 
It's not a viable alternative! If it were there would be no point in discussing 
it!

  Jack 
  Dear jack. 

  If you re-read me correctly, you can see that it is viable as an alternative 
for scientific discussion. This does not mean it happened that way. We believe 
it didn't. 

  I say the exact same thing as regards the heliocentrism debate, although the 
potential of proving our aether involvement in matter is still also a viable 
alternative for geocentrism. 

  As a means of converting a scientist or any ordinary person with reasonable 
intelligence, in to accepting the word of God as true, then I agree most 
definitely there is no point in the discussion. Both sides of the evolution 
debate are theoretical and as such, and only for that reason, worthy of 
discussion. 

  Let me offer an example to clear up my meaning and use of viable alternative. 

  In faith we believe that Lazarus was truely dead and that the body was 
already corrupting, when jesus brought him back to life. 

  A viable alternative for discussion is that Lazarus was merely in a coma, a 
hypnotic state known as ...... where the vital signs are near zero, and he only 
appears to be dead. 

  This is a viable alternative because it is a theoretical probability in 
science and happens reasonably often.

  Given that we can produce no direct provable evidence of this event, it 
cannot be used as proof that God exists, or that the Bible is His word.  

  Therefore, indeed from a scientific point of view it is a pointless 
discussion if your motive or objective is to prove God raised Lazarus from the 
dead, or that there is a God. 

  You, and everybody else apparently, have consistently avoided my challenge 
that God , by His own word, created an old or aged world. This validates the 
evolutionists and Pauls claim of an aged world beyond 10,000 years. That their 
speculations on this age may be varied and possibly erroneous has no bearing on 
the fact that it is or was much older than the nominal 7,000 years given at 
creation. 

  To prove creation, you need to prove the existence of God first, and finding 
"speculative flaws" in evolution, which the science admits is part and parcel 
of the learning process of science, is definitely not the way to go about that. 
 

  Philip. 

    ----- Original Message ----- 
    From: Jack Lewis 
    To: geocentrism@xxxxxxxxxxxxx 
    Sent: Thursday, September 27, 2007 9:50 PM
    Subject: [geocentrism] Re: excuse my paranoia


    Dear Philip,
    Of course I'm biased, but not against true science.

    I don't understand your comment below. Your sure its a viable alternative? 
It's not a viable alternative! If it were there would be no point in discussing 
it!

    Jack 
      ----- Original Message ----- 
      From: philip madsen 
      To: geocentrism list 
      Sent: Thursday, September 27, 2007 9:50 AM
      Subject: [geocentrism] Re: excuse my paranoia


      Not me. I am absolutely certain that evolution is a viable alternative as 
to how we arrived today. I just happen to know with certainty that it did not 
happen that way, and that the world has existed no more than 10,000 years and 
probably less. 



----------------------------------------------------------------------------


    No virus found in this incoming message.
    Checked by AVG Free Edition. 
    Version: 7.5.488 / Virus Database: 269.13.31/1031 - Release Date: 
26/09/2007 12:12 PM



------------------------------------------------------------------------------


  No virus found in this incoming message.
  Checked by AVG Free Edition. 
  Version: 7.5.488 / Virus Database: 269.13.33/1034 - Release Date: 27/09/2007 
5:00 PM

Other related posts: