[geocentrism] chatter thread..
- From: "philip madsen" <pma15027@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- To: <geocentrism@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Mon, 12 Nov 2007 11:17:58 +1000
Guys this clogging up the Two spin axes of Earth thread. Does no one like my
Chatter thread idea?
Paul D
and you failed to change the thread yourself with your chatter. I just did
it.. If you look archives wise You will find I am the greatest subject line
composer on this list..
all thats needed is to avoid "Two spin axes of Earth?'" and change the
subject line every time you chatter off subject. Its already running wild.. .
Philip.
----- Original Message -----
From: Paul Deema
To: geocentrism@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Sent: Monday, November 12, 2007 10:34 AM
Subject: [geocentrism] Re: Two spin axes of Earth?
PhilipM
Shame on me -- I had forgotten! And that is an area in which we used to lead
the world I'm told. Don't know about today.
Guys this clogging up the Two spin axes of Earth thread. Does no one like my
Chatter thread idea?
Paul D
philip madsen <pma15027@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Not to forget the vast field of Radio astronomy... much more exciting in
some ways even if there are no hubble like pictures..
Phil
----- Original Message -----
From: Paul Deema
To: geocentrism@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Sent: Monday, November 12, 2007 9:59 AM
Subject: [geocentrism] Re: Two spin axes of Earth?
Neville J
I didn't mention telescopes but I get your point. I also understand that
astronomers today do not sit in freezing conditions, watering eyes straining at
eyepieces and sketching intermittently on a pad with a pencil held in one of
those fingerless glove things.
Paul D
Neville Jones <njones@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Paul,
The diffraction limit of "big expensive" telescopes is not achieved in
the real world. Also, no astronomer is "directly examin[ing] the universe," but
rather making observations in a terrestrial laboratory and seeking to promote
and understand those observations within the currently accepted model.
Neville
www.GeocentricUniverse.com
-----Original Message-----
From: paul_deema@xxxxxxxxxxx
Sent: Sun, 11 Nov 2007 18:17:37 +0000 (GMT)
Jack L
I doubt one person in a hundred would regard this statement as
patronising. There was an attempt at humour in there -- perhaps that is what
has sparked your ire?
What Regner is doing that only a very small percentage of the overall
population is doing -- is being a professional astronomer. He gets to use lots
of big expensive exciting equipment to directly examine the universe. I don't
know about you but I'm envious.
Paul D
----- Original Message ----
From: Jack Lewis <jack.lewis@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
To: geocentrism@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Dear Paul,
Why did you find it necessary to patronise Regner in that way?
Regarding the 'real thing' what in heavens name is Regner doing that no-one
else is?
Jack
----- Original Message -----
From: Paul Deema
To: geocentrism@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Allen D
I'd be careful about advising Regner to refer to a model. He
doesn't need one. He plays with the real thing!
Paul D
Paul D
--------------------------------------------------------------------------
National Bingo Night. Play along for the chance to win $10,000 every
week. Download your gamecard now at Yahoo!7 TV.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------
No virus found in this incoming message.
Checked by AVG Free Edition.
Version: 7.5.503 / Virus Database: 269.15.29/1124 - Release Date:
11/11/2007 10:12 AM
Paul D
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
National Bingo Night. Play along for the chance to win $10,000 every week.
Download your gamecard now at Yahoo!7 TV.
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
No virus found in this incoming message.
Checked by AVG Free Edition.
Version: 7.5.503 / Virus Database: 269.15.29/1124 - Release Date: 11/11/2007
10:12 AM
Other related posts:
- » [geocentrism] chatter thread..
