[geocentrism] Re: Zodiac light and solar dust
- From: "philip madsen" <pma15027@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- To: <geocentrism@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Mon, 19 Feb 2007 07:10:40 +1000
Well, I'll never release a draft again without running Spellcheck...
Robert, a draft is for proof reading.. Let the willing do the work!
A speel checker may be American, and therefore faulty. Us Aussies kno how to
speel ploperly, specially since we joined Aisure. Even Oxford carnt speel no
more since it went Packastaney.
Philip.
----- Original Message -----
From: Robert Bennett
To: geocentrism@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Sent: Monday, February 19, 2007 5:07 AM
Subject: [geocentrism] Re: Zodiac light and solar dust
Well, I'll never release a draft again without running Spellcheck...
Thanks to Allen & Paul for the syntax corrections - but I was really hoping
for some semantic feedback on the ZL and IDC before releasing
another GC proof now in prep - on the false analysis of meteor shower
patterns by our MS friends..
Allen: asked where did I find this?
I carefully research MS claims. Here the lack of explanation for ZL
reflection across the ecliptic made no sense.
In this case of the Zodiacal Light MS seem unaware of the ecliptic symmetry
conflict with their current thinking. Once they are alerted, we can predict
that
a.. The anomaly will be ignored, as they did with Marshall Hall 150 years
ago and/or
b.. The Ulysses flight data will be taken off the ESA Web site and/or
c.. A flow of dark matter or energy (defined to be undetectable) will
account for the unexpected symmetry
Paul: has a problem here, since there's no Web site he can run to and copy
MS doctrine - there isn't any. Also, all the data is supplied by MS sources,
not dissidents.
May finally have to do some research and reasoning on his own... which is a
good thing.
Neville: may have a problem with the ESA source - is the Ulysses program a
fraud, the data manufactured as part of the NASA conspiracy? After all, NASA
is a supporting partner.
BTW: Will negative paralllax be posted again? It disappeared before I could
read it.
Signing off with tongue slightly in cheek,
Robert
-----Original Message-----
From: geocentrism-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
[mailto:geocentrism-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx]On Behalf Of Paul Deema
Sent: Saturday, February 17, 2007 1:17 PM
To: Geocentrism@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: [geocentrism] Zodiac light and solar dust
Robert
Yes I found 'theis' also but Allen was lots quicker than I.
However, I think I'm first with these --
Page 2 -- "To simplify the micro-meteoroid model, several assumptions weare
made: " ( micro meteoroid; were).
Page 3 -- "... (Dermott et al. 1994) ..." (Superflous full stop (period if
you're American!)).
Page 3 -- "The dust itself consists of large interplanetary micrometeoroids
... " (micro meteoroids).
Page 3 -- "In situ dust detectors onboard the Galileo..." (on board).
Page 5 -- "... measured on earth or by ulysses,... (Ulysses).
Page 5 -- "... are measured simultaneouly, even though... " (simultaneously).
Page 7 -- "...variations of the heliospheric magnetic field: 0.01 to 44000
nT". (Don't know what this should be but nT looks wrong to me.
Don't think my knowledge will permit me to find any factual errors (if such
should exist). There is such a lot to check isn't there?
Paul D
Send instant messages to your online friends http://au.messenger.yahoo.com
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
No virus found in this incoming message.
Checked by AVG Free Edition.
Version: 7.5.441 / Virus Database: 268.18.2/692 - Release Date: 18/02/2007
4:35 PM
Other related posts:
