[geocentrism] Re: Transitions - the fossils that don't exist

  • From: "Jack Lewis" <jack.lewis@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
  • To: <geocentrism@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
  • Date: Sun, 30 Sep 2007 13:02:16 +0100

Dear Paul,
Here is an example of selective interpretation of a creationist statement 
'There are no transitional fossils'. Quoted from the link below.
Transition from primitive jawless fish to sharks, skates, and rays
All of these are fish and not transactional from some other 'kind'. Is this the 
best evolutionists can do in providing transitional fossil evidence? Think 
about it, their should be millions of of fossils showing the gradual transition 
between one form and another. The article takes the author to task over their 
misleading initial statements.


  ----- Original Message ----- 
  From: Bernie Brauer 
  To: geocentrism@xxxxxxxxxxxxx 
  Sent: Saturday, September 29, 2007 8:43 PM
  Subject: [geocentrism] Transitions - the fossils that don't exist 

  I had this in my archives, forget if I posted it before.

  By Richard Milton

  Check out the hottest 2008 models today at Yahoo! Autos. 

Other related posts: