[geocentrism] Re: Tides and the moon and M-M

  • From: Allen Daves <allendaves@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
  • To: geocentrism@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
  • Date: Fri, 4 Apr 2008 08:52:46 -0700 (PDT)


----- Original Message ----
From: Jack Lewis <jack.lewis@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
To: geocentrism@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Sent: Friday, April 4, 2008 1:42:46 AM
Subject: [geocentrism] Re: Tides and the moon and M-M

Where can I find out more about this 'Alias effect'?


Bernie Brauer wrote: 
"It is widely accepted, although not by me, that the moon causes the tides. It 
is also widely accepted, although not by me, that there exists a zero-gravity 
point situated somewhere between the World and moon.
My question is this: If the ocean were situated at the zero-gravity point, then 
there would be no tide. Closer to the World the pull of the World is stronger. 
Closer to the moon the pull of the moon is stronger. The net effect, this side 
of the zero-gravity point, is always a positive pull by the World. Since this 
is equivalent to a force of gravity that produces a stronger pull as we take 
the oceans further this side of the zero-gravity point, then how does the moon 
produce the tides?"  Dr. Neville T. Jones
"IT DOES NOT DIRECTLY, ONLY INDIRECTLY. Hooray! Iʼm so glad finally someone 
else sees this issue too. Further, the tides are one of the major reasons why I 
model gravity as a vibration, for The Alias Effect shows that the position of 
the sun and moon has a relationship to gravity on Earth but tides demonstrate 
that they are not directly related due to the whole satellites issues as well 
as atmosphere. However, in vibrational gravity the positions of CB's ( 
Celestial Bodies ) will affect the vibrational wave. In short, the tides are 
caused by the squeezing effect of the gravity vibration, that is to say, that 
there is no additional or absence of gravity force, only a uneven squeezing 
effect that is a result in part due to sun/moon/background-stars positioning ( 
The Alias Effect proves this ). A vibration is the only known physical 
explanation that can account for that effect while producing a non-detectable 
gravity force in all of its anomalies, which
 are not anomalies but rather clear indicators that gravity is a vibration of 
aether waves. No other known physical construct could account for all those 
things."  Allen Daves

Jack Lewis <jack.lewis@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
I haven't yet seen anyone come with an answer to something Neville, I think, 
once said regarding the point, which must exist, between the Earth and the Moon 
where the gravity is zero. This being the case how is it that the Moon controls 
the tides? I'm sure, I think, that there must be a simple answer. 

The M-M part of the subject is to ask Regner how he is getting on with the 
answering the interferometer experiments wrt a non-moving Earth?


You rock. That's why Blockbuster's offering you one month of Blockbuster Total 
Access, No Cost. 

Other related posts: