[geocentrism] Re: Tides and the moon and M-M

  • From: "philip madsen" <pma15027@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
  • To: <geocentrism@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
  • Date: Tue, 8 Apr 2008 13:05:51 +1000

Jack we did bring up the Maurice Allais mystery many moons ago. I am grateful 
to Allen for these added links which were not in my file. 

Without my having  much technical detail in support , I think NASA and others 
attributing the anomaly he noticed with the pendulum to be caused by some lack 
in Newtons theory of gravity to be off track.  They simply do not accept the 
aether, and therefore believing the coriolis forces etc to be caused by the 
earths physical rotation in the HC system, gravity  is all that they have to 

Meanwhile if the coriolis forses , the faucault pendulum , etc are due to a 
rotating universal aether and a stationary earth, which I have always supposed, 
it is more logical from our standpoint  to expect coriolis forces applied to 
the pendulum  to be disrupted by an eclipse, apart from and additional to the 
normal expected gravitational changes that occur. 

The physical reality is this. The effect noticed can be due to either a 
momentary fluctuation in the earths rotation, or in the aethers rotation over 
that area of space where the alignment occurs.  The former for obvious reasons 
(the energy factor) is illogical. 

Its just one more piece of evidence in support of the aether and geocentrism. 

I think I said this months ago..  The Allais anomaly is up our geocentrist 
alley.  Hence it is forgotten, ignored, and to be deplored  as a null event 
similarly as they deplore the MM  and Dayton Millar experiments. The only 
avenue that can explain it is forbidden to them. That they ban and forbid 
Supernaturalism to science I can easily accept; but to ban physical phenomena 
itself simply because it may lead to supernaturalism, is not only unscientific 
but totaly dishonest as well. 


  ----- Original Message ----- 
  From: Jack Lewis 
  To: geocentrism@xxxxxxxxxxxxx 
  Sent: Friday, April 04, 2008 6:42 PM
  Subject: [geocentrism] Re: Tides and the moon and M-M

  Where can I find out more about this 'Alias effect'?


  Bernie Brauer wrote: 
    "It is widely accepted, although not by me, that the moon causes the tides. 
It is also widely accepted, although not by me, that there exists a 
zero-gravity point situated somewhere between the World and moon.
    My question is this: If the ocean were situated at the zero-gravity point, 
then there would be no tide. Closer to the World the pull of the World is 
stronger. Closer to the moon the pull of the moon is stronger. The net effect, 
this side of the zero-gravity point, is always a positive pull by the World. 
Since this is equivalent to a force of gravity that produces a stronger pull as 
we take the oceans further this side of the zero-gravity point, then how does 
the moon produce the tides?"  Dr. Neville T. Jones
    "IT DOES NOT DIRECTLY, ONLY INDIRECTLY. Hooray! I'm so glad finally someone 
else sees this issue too. Further, the tides are one of the major reasons why I 
model gravity as a vibration, for The Alias Effect shows that the position of 
the sun and moon has a relationship to gravity on Earth but tides demonstrate 
that they are not directly related due to the whole satellites issues as well 
as atmosphere. However, in vibrational gravity the positions of CB's ( 
Celestial Bodies ) will affect the vibrational wave. In short, the tides are 
caused by the squeezing effect of the gravity vibration, that is to say, that 
there is no additional or absence of gravity force, only a uneven squeezing 
effect that is a result in part due to sun/moon/background-stars positioning ( 
The Alias Effect proves this ). A vibration is the only known physical 
explanation that can account for that effect while producing a non-detectable 
gravity force in all of its anomalies, which are not anomalies but rather clear 
indicators that gravity is a vibration of aether waves. No other known physical 
construct could account for all those things."  Allen Daves

    Jack Lewis <jack.lewis@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
      I haven't yet seen anyone come with an answer to something Neville, I 
think, once said regarding the point, which must exist, between the Earth and 
the Moon where the gravity is zero. This being the case how is it that the Moon 
controls the tides? I'm sure, I think, that there must be a simple answer. 

      The M-M part of the subject is to ask Regner how he is getting on with 
the answering the interferometer experiments wrt a non-moving Earth?


    You rock. That's why Blockbuster's offering you one month of Blockbuster 
Total Access, No Cost. 


  No virus found in this incoming message.
  Checked by AVG. 
  Version: 7.5.519 / Virus Database: 269.22.5/1358 - Release Date: 3/04/2008 
6:36 PM

Other related posts: