[geocentrism] Re: Three days and three nights
- From: "Philip" <joyphil@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- To: <geocentrism@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Sat, 14 May 2005 13:23:51 +1000
It seems that if I want to seek out a Biblical Calendar and walk in that
"narrow path," at least it should be allowed and not judged.
Carl
Exactly Carl. Otherwise we may even be judged for discussing the cosmology of
the Biblical universe. Heaven forbid.
Philip.
----- Original Message -----
From: Carl Felland
To: geocentrism@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Sent: Saturday, May 14, 2005 12:07 PM
Subject: [geocentrism] Re: Three days and three nights
My point would be that we do not have scripture for the Gregorian
calendar that most follow today.
Col. 2:16 16. Let no man therefore judge you in meat, or in drink, or in
respect of an holyday, or of the new moon, or of the sabbath days:
It seems that if I want to seek out a Biblical Calendar and walk in that
"narrow path," at least it should be allowed and not judged.
Carl
Allen Daves wrote:
>If you want to bring it to an end I well accept that but your reasoning is
your own not scripture. Don?t think beyond what is written.... Goes for
Calendar creation, new moons or anything else. I am at a loss for why you find
that so hard to understand. My point in the new moon posting was if you don?t
have scripture leave it alone... don?t create what is not there.
>
>Allen
>
>
>"Dr. Neville Jones" <ntj005@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:In your last posting, you
asked what the references were. Now you have been provided with them, your only
response seems to be "so?" If it's not spelt out for us, then we can't ever
know? Is this being "created in God's image?" Is this "reason[ing] together?"
>
>Next time you're in an aeroplane, I hope that the Captain has every single,
possible, conceivable situation clearly spelt out for him in the manual,
because otherwise he won't be able to think for himself, right?
>
>You position cannot be maintained, Allen. If it could, then everybody on the
World could simply READ the Bible every night.
>
>You have also avoided the INSTRUCTIONS given you clearly in Exodus,
Leviticus and Deuteronomy, for example.
>
>I think that this discussion has reached a stage where a conclusion can be
draw. Philip and I have tried to reason with you. Does anyone else care to
comment before I draw a line under it?
>
>Neville.
>
>Allen Daves wrote:
>1 Sam. 20:5 5. And "David said unto Jonathan, Behold, to morrow is the new
moon,"
>
>1 Sam. 20:18. Then "Jonathan said to David, To morrow is the new moon:" and
thou shalt be missed, because thy seat will be empty.
>
>David and Jonathan both agree that tomorrow is the new moon..So?
>
>1 Sam. 20:24. So David hid himself in the field: and when the new moon was
come, the king sat him down to eat meat.
>
>DAVID hid untill the new moon ??.so?
>
>2 Ki. 4:23 23. And he said, Wherefore wilt thou go to him "to day"? it is
neither new moon, nor sabbath. And she said, It shall be well. Does cripture
difinne What day this is it only says that that day is not the new moon.
?.don?t read into it.
>
>Ps. 81:3. Blow up the trumpet in the new moon, in the time appointed, on our
solemn feast day. Isa. 66: 23. And it shall come to pass, that from one new
moon to another, and from one sabbath to another, shall all flesh come to
worship before me, saith the Lord.
>
>Eze. 46:1 Thus saith the Lord God; The gate of the inner court that looketh
toward the east shall be shut the six working days; but on the sabbath it shall
be opened, and in the day of the new moon it shall be opened.
>
>Eze. 46:6 And in the day of the new moon it shall be a young bullock without
blemish, and six lambs, and a ram: they shall be without blemish.
>
>Amos 8:5 Saying, When will the new moon be gone, that we may sell corn? and
the sabbath, that we may set forth wheat, making the ephah small, and the
shekel great, and falsifying the balances by deceit?
>
>Col. 2:16 16. Let no man therefore judge you in meat, or in drink, or in
respect of an holyday, or of the new moon, or of the sabbath days:
>
>
>
>There is Something called and recognized as a new moon but what exactly that
is not specified here?? so what is the difficulty don?t read into anything in
to it. All you know is that there is such a thing a new moon but with out
scripture to tell you anything other than that, You cannot make statements or
calendars with any more detailed other than what is provided. If it is not
provided don?t try to "MAKE IT". I don?t understand why this is difficult. If
text doesn?t provide every little detail then you must be satisfied with what
it does state not speculate about what it is not saying. Don?t think beyond
what is written.
>
>Allen
>
>
>"Dr. Neville Jones" wrote:1 Sam. 20:5
>1 Sam. 20:18
>1 Sam. 20:24
>2 Ki. 4:23
>Ps. 81:3
>Isa. 66:23
>Eze. 46:1
>Eze. 46:6
>Amos 8:5
>Col. 2:16
>
>So, again I ask you, Allen, is it a "new" moon or isn't it?
>
>Neville.
>
>Allen Daves wrote:
>I guess I missed that posting. What are the references for this? What
scriptures are we talking about?..I know this if it calls it a new moon then it
is a new moon. If it does not specifically call it a new moon then you
shouldn't read into it. You take it exactly what all the scriptures say about
that moon the way it says it. If scripture does not specify how would I or
anyone for that mater know? And what proof could you offer anyway? Something?s
are just not given and It will not contradict itself if you don't force meaning
on it.
>
>Allen
>
>---------------------------------
>Yahoo! Messenger - want a free & easy way to contact your friends online?
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>---------------------------------
>How much free photo storage do you get? Store your holiday snaps for FREE
with Yahoo! Photos. Get Yahoo! Photos
>
>
>
>
>
>
>.
>
>
>
Other related posts:
