[geocentrism] Re: Three days and three nights
- From: Carl Felland <cfelland@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- To: geocentrism@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Date: Fri, 13 May 2005 21:07:24 -0500
My point would be that we do not have scripture for the Gregorian
calendar that most follow today.
Col. 2:16 16. Let no man therefore judge you in meat, or in drink, or in
respect of an holyday, or of the new moon, or of the sabbath days:
It seems that if I want to seek out a Biblical Calendar and walk in that
"narrow path," at least it should be allowed and not judged.
Carl
Allen Daves wrote:
>If you want to bring it to an end I well accept that but your reasoning is
>your own not scripture. Don’t think beyond what is written.... Goes for
>Calendar creation, new moons or anything else. I am at a loss for why you find
>that so hard to understand. My point in the new moon posting was if you don’t
>have scripture leave it alone... don’t create what is not there.
>
>Allen
>
>
>"Dr. Neville Jones" <ntj005@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:In your last posting, you asked
>what the references were. Now you have been provided with them, your only
>response seems to be "so?" If it's not spelt out for us, then we can't ever
>know? Is this being "created in God's image?" Is this "reason[ing] together?"
>
>Next time you're in an aeroplane, I hope that the Captain has every single,
>possible, conceivable situation clearly spelt out for him in the manual,
>because otherwise he won't be able to think for himself, right?
>
>You position cannot be maintained, Allen. If it could, then everybody on the
>World could simply READ the Bible every night.
>
>You have also avoided the INSTRUCTIONS given you clearly in Exodus, Leviticus
>and Deuteronomy, for example.
>
>I think that this discussion has reached a stage where a conclusion can be
>draw. Philip and I have tried to reason with you. Does anyone else care to
>comment before I draw a line under it?
>
>Neville.
>
>Allen Daves wrote:
>1 Sam. 20:5 5. And "David said unto Jonathan, Behold, to morrow is the new
>moon,"
>
>1 Sam. 20:18. Then "Jonathan said to David, To morrow is the new moon:" and
>thou shalt be missed, because thy seat will be empty.
>
>David and Jonathan both agree that tomorrow is the new moon..So?
>
>1 Sam. 20:24. So David hid himself in the field: and when the new moon was
>come, the king sat him down to eat meat.
>
>DAVID hid untill the new moon …….so?
>
>2 Ki. 4:23 23. And he said, Wherefore wilt thou go to him "to day"? it is
>neither new moon, nor sabbath. And she said, It shall be well. Does cripture
>difinne What day this is it only says that that day is not the new moon.
>….don’t read into it.
>
>Ps. 81:3. Blow up the trumpet in the new moon, in the time appointed, on our
>solemn feast day. Isa. 66: 23. And it shall come to pass, that from one new
>moon to another, and from one sabbath to another, shall all flesh come to
>worship before me, saith the Lord.
>
>Eze. 46:1 Thus saith the Lord God; The gate of the inner court that looketh
>toward the east shall be shut the six working days; but on the sabbath it
>shall be opened, and in the day of the new moon it shall be opened.
>
>Eze. 46:6 And in the day of the new moon it shall be a young bullock without
>blemish, and six lambs, and a ram: they shall be without blemish.
>
>Amos 8:5 Saying, When will the new moon be gone, that we may sell corn? and
>the sabbath, that we may set forth wheat, making the ephah small, and the
>shekel great, and falsifying the balances by deceit?
>
>Col. 2:16 16. Let no man therefore judge you in meat, or in drink, or in
>respect of an holyday, or of the new moon, or of the sabbath days:
>
>
>
>There is Something called and recognized as a new moon but what exactly that
>is not specified here…… so what is the difficulty don’t read into anything in
>to it. All you know is that there is such a thing a new moon but with out
>scripture to tell you anything other than that, You cannot make statements or
>calendars with any more detailed other than what is provided. If it is not
>provided don’t try to "MAKE IT". I don’t understand why this is difficult. If
>text doesn’t provide every little detail then you must be satisfied with what
>it does state not speculate about what it is not saying. Don’t think beyond
>what is written.
>
>Allen
>
>
>"Dr. Neville Jones" wrote:1 Sam. 20:5
>1 Sam. 20:18
>1 Sam. 20:24
>2 Ki. 4:23
>Ps. 81:3
>Isa. 66:23
>Eze. 46:1
>Eze. 46:6
>Amos 8:5
>Col. 2:16
>
>So, again I ask you, Allen, is it a "new" moon or isn't it?
>
>Neville.
>
>Allen Daves wrote:
>I guess I missed that posting. What are the references for this? What
>scriptures are we talking about?..I know this if it calls it a new moon then
>it is a new moon. If it does not specifically call it a new moon then you
>shouldn't read into it. You take it exactly what all the scriptures say about
>that moon the way it says it. If scripture does not specify how would I or
>anyone for that mater know? And what proof could you offer anyway? Something’s
>are just not given and It will not contradict itself if you don't force
>meaning on it.
>
>Allen
>
>---------------------------------
>Yahoo! Messenger - want a free & easy way to contact your friends online?
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>---------------------------------
>How much free photo storage do you get? Store your holiday snaps for FREE with
>Yahoo! Photos. Get Yahoo! Photos
>
>
>
>
>
>
>.
>
>
>
Other related posts:
