[geocentrism] Re: The Criminal History of the Papacy - Part 2
- From: "John Roodt" <johnroodt@xxxxxxxxx>
- To: geocentrism@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Date: Tue, 7 Aug 2007 19:41:27 +1000
I have my suspicions regarding this author too...
"The first one to put forward his case always seems right until another
comes to examine him". Or when he/she writes of something that you have
equal or greater knowledge of.
Did you notice that other books he has written? There was a list at the end
of the article. It throws into question everything he says in this article.
I took an elective on Ancient History at University -- many years ago -- and
really enjoyed one of the required readings called "Rome". I was amazed by
the authors "knowledge and insight". Until, that is, I came to the chapter
titled "The Jews, Jesus and Paul". By the end of it I thought that if he
could be so wrong about that subject that he had probably made up the rest
of the book. I could never bring myself to read it again.
John
On 8/7/07, marc-veilleux@xxxxxxxxxxxx <marc-veilleux@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> Bernie,
> Even if the ennemies of the Church refer sometimes to catholic writings,
> it is only to twist the information as they twist the meaning of
> Scriptures. If we would follow the criterium they use in the site below,
> none of the apostle could stand; they would all be condemned by those
> criterium.
> Marc V.
>
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> *From:* Bernie Brauer
> *Sent:* 4 août 2007 18:14
> *To:* geocentrism@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
> *Subject:* [geocentrism] The Criminal History of the Papacy - Part 2
>
> http://www.wakeupfromyourslumber.com/node/2828
>
> ------------------------------
> Pinpoint customers
> <http://us.rd.yahoo.com/evt=48250/*http://searchmarketing.yahoo.com/arp/sponsoredsearch_v9.php?o=US2226&cmp=Yahoo&ctv=AprNI&s=Y&s2=EM&b=50>who
> are looking for what you sell.
>
>
Other related posts:
