[geocentrism] Re: Space Shuttle Pics
- From: "philip madsen" <pma15027@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- To: <geocentrism@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Mon, 10 Sep 2007 12:39:57 +1000
Neville has a point, unless there was a light inside their helmets, any direct
gaze into open space away from the sun and any mountains, would present a black
void, and the iris's would open to max. However why they would do that , unless
the guy was astronomer enclined, escapes me.. Isn't there much too much more
exciting things happening..
I am not by this denying a hoax possibility, but rather trying to dispense with
all circumstantial evidence. It may be proven that faked movie productions were
used for glamorous promotions of the mission, but this only proves a zeal for
public approval. No one it seems has come up with any glaring faults in the
original black and white TV transmissions re displaced shadows et al , have
they? It is in these that a hoax must be proven for most to accept it.
Philip.
----- Original Message -----
From: Neville Jones
To: geocentrism@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Sent: Monday, September 10, 2007 11:37 AM
Subject: [geocentrism] Re: Space Shuttle Pics
Paul,
My replies in red
www.GeocentricUniverse.com
-----Original Message-----
From: paul_deema@xxxxxxxxxxx
Sent: Sun, 9 Sep 2007 17:26:33 +0000 (GMT)
Neville J
Please allow me a dissenting view! Certainly.
The suggestion that the Moon has nothing to reflect off is simply wrong.
You can read a book by its light on Earth a quarter million miles away on a
clear Full Moon night. It has an albeido of 7%! The fact that the Moon reflects
light does not alter the fact that the Moon's (reflected) light has nothing to
reflect off. The albedo has nothing to do with what I am saying. There are no
clouds, no trees, no buildings, and there is no atmosphere.
Now if you were standing on it and there were scratches and dust on your
visor, however small and/or sparse, the glare would certainly shut down your
irises. Utter nonsense. The Moon must be at least as far, if not farther, away
from the Sun as we are. When was the last time your iris "shut down"?! But
apart from that, and I think you may have the expertise to evaluate this
suggestion, you don't have to be looking at a bright object in order for your
irises to close down -- it is only necessary that light can enter your eyes
from an object at any angle. I speak from the perspective of someone who both
wears spectacles and sands wood. Paul, you would simply have to do the same
thing that you have to do here, either tilt your head back or use your hand as
a blinker.
As the shuttle crew have (finally) confirmed, you can see stars in space,
and those stars are "BRILLIANT."
Neville.
Paul D
----- Original Message ----
From: Neville Jones <njones@xxxxxxxxx>
To: geocentrism@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Sent: Sunday, 9 September, 2007 12:47:23 AM
Subject: [geocentrism] Re: Space Shuttle Pics
Philip,
Your post seems strangely geared toward sowing confusion and resisting
progress. Perhaps you are on one of your Devil's Advocate trips, but please do
not take such positions for the hell of it.
The windows of the shuttle reflect light , just like in a railway carriage
at night. Of course you would need to turn off the lights, or else press
yourself right up against the glass.
The Moon has no such effect, because there is nothing for the light to
reflect off. Specifically, there is no atmosphere. Look away from the surface
and there is no light entering your eye except from ... the stars.
No one here is "grasping at straws." Why are you so reluctant to accept
this NASA U-turn on seeing stars?
Neville
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
No virus found in this incoming message.
Checked by AVG Free Edition.
Version: 7.5.485 / Virus Database: 269.13.12/997 - Release Date: 9/09/2007
10:17 AM
Other related posts:
