[geocentrism] Re: Space Shuttle Pics

  • From: Paul Deema <paul_deema@xxxxxxxxxxx>
  • To: geocentrism@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
  • Date: Thu, 6 Sep 2007 12:04:20 +0000 (GMT)

Jack L
Please allow me to intrude. It's all about physics and the way your eyes 
respond to light. Try this experiment. You'll need access to a 500W QI lamp and 
a large white sheet and a rotary cloths line and a dark clear night at New 
Moon. Well it doesn't need to be rotary but these are the most common here in 
Oz; and while New Moon is best, most any time the Moon is below the horizon at 
night will do. Of course you won't want to be on the foreshore in Blackpool 
either -- I believe it's pretty well lit up there at night.
The drill is this -- go out to the cloths line where you've hung the sheet and 
stand where you can see the stars but the sheet is just below your field of 
view. The lamp should be between you and the sheet and directed to shine 
directly on the sheet but so placed that none of its light shines directly into 
your eyes. It will help if your clothes line is hidden from street lights. Get 
used to the conditions -- a few minutes at least -- and have a willing 
assistant who is out of sight, turn on the lamp without warning and notice how 
the number of stars you can see diminishes. Then -- in your mind -- put 
yourself in full sunlight with no atmosphere and surround yourself with white 
and gold reflecting surfaces -- and think of how many fewer stars you would be 
able to see that if all those reflecting surfaces were absent.
You could also try the reverse situation. It is said that you can see stars in 
full sunlight if you are at the bottom of a deep well. I don't know if it's 
true or not. However, if you don't have a well, two lengths of PVC 90mm storm 
water pipe painted dull black on the inside -- one for each eye -- may well do 
the trick. Arrange a light tight viewing aperture between your eyes and the 
pipes and look up, again allowing several minutes for your eyes to adjust. 
Again, I don't know if this will work but it sounds plausible.
This whole exercise is about reducing to an absolute minimum, the light which 
can shut down your irises while maximising the opportunity for your retinas to 
collect enough of the faint light from the stars to register an impression.
And remember -- cameras work on the same principles.
Paul D

----- Original Message ----
From: Jack Lewis <jack.lewis@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
To: geocentrism@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Sent: Thursday, 6 September, 2007 9:54:03 AM
Subject: [geocentrism] Re: Space Shuttle Pics

But would the astronauts see stars? Armstrong said they couldn't - whose 
telling the truth?
----- Original Message ----- 
From: philip madsen 
To: geocentrism@xxxxxxxxxxxxx 
Sent: Thursday, September 06, 2007 6:59 AM
Subject: [geocentrism] Re: Space Shuttle Pics

Stars or no stars depends on the exposure and shutter speed.  I would not 
expect to see stars in a photo, coz then the main object would be overexposed.. 
 wouldn't it?  

Sick of deleting your inbox? Yahoo!7 Mail has free unlimited storage.

Other related posts: