[geocentrism] Re: Solar heat

  • From: <marc-veilleux@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
  • To: geocentrism@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
  • Date: Sat, 24 Feb 2007 21:19:41 +0000

Phil,
according to what I read recently, on Earth the antartic (south pole) is not melting as much as it is in the artic (north pole). About Hell and spirit, you seem to be mistaken: man is not and will never be a pure Spirit as God. Man will always have a body and soul; but it is the Spirit that gives (real) life to the soul and body. It seems to me that the soul is not pure spirit but somehow a medium between the Spirit and the body (flesh). On Judgment day, it will be the resurrection of the body and soul, both incorruptible. The spirit cannot die nor resurrect. So we can assume that after the resurrection everybody will feel the heat, cold, pain, etc...in Hell, probably not the way we sense it now, but certainly in a way or the other. 

Marc V






From: "philip madsen" <pma15027@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Reply-To: geocentrism@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
To: <geocentrism@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: [geocentrism] Re: Solar heat
Date: Sat, 24 Feb 2007 17:58:15 +1000

OK Marc..  I get what you are saying.

"Allright then, but how do you explain that the heat goes more in one
direction of the Sun than in the other ? "

One pole of the sun is cooler than the other. That's the
>surprising
>   >conclusion just announced by scientists who have been analyzing data
>from
>   >the ESA-NASA Ulysses spacecraft.
So you raise the good point.. but my joke was all about it not being convection, at least not normal convection.
Actually even if the NASA data was not suspect, there are all sorts of influences, gravity not the least, which would explain the polar difference. Did I not see somewhere that Mars polar ice caps also differ in size.. what about earth?
Not to worry... Lets wonder where Hell is, what sort of fire or heat it contains, that can torture spiritual souls... it does not seem to me that normal nuclear or chemical fire of the sun or the earths interior would hurt a spirit. 

Philip.
  ----- Original Message -----
  From: marc-veilleux@xxxxxxxxxxxx
  To: geocentrism@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
  Sent: Saturday, February 24, 2007 9:56 AM
  Subject: [geocentrism] Re: Solar heat


  Allright then, but how do you explain that the heat goes more in one
direction of the Sun than in the other ? It would be interesting to find 
  out if the same applies for the planets.
  Marc V

  From: "philip madsen" <pma15027@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
  >Reply-To: geocentrism@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
  >To: "geocentrism list" <geocentrism@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
  >Subject: [geocentrism] subjective terms
  >Date: Sat, 24 Feb 2007 07:33:03 +1000
  >
  >
  >
  >
  >
  >   Very simple Phil, in an a-centric universe there are no up and down,
  >while
> in a geostatic universe,it seems to me that anything under (or south of) 
  >the
  >   ecliptic is down and anything over (or north of) the ecliptic is up!
  >   Christus Imperat,
  >   Marc Veilleux
  >
  >   I thought that was
> European elitism, that you think you is on top of the world and we is 
  >down under...
  >   We are told that Paradise, supposedly the Garden of Eden, and where
>Enoch and Elias still not dead abode, still exists but is hidden from our >sensors.. Now where it is, could be the top of the world!.. But seriously, >up or down, arn't these subjective terms, having no objective reality in 
  >space?
  >
  >   Phil
  >
  >   >From: "philip madsen" <pma15027@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
  >   >Reply-To: geocentrism@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
  >   >To: <geocentrism@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
  >   >Subject: [geocentrism] Re: NASA Science
  >   >Date: Fri, 23 Feb 2007 09:45:50 +1000
  >   >
  >   >Please explain Marc..  I seem to miss the point of my own joke..
  >Philip.
  >   >   ----- Original Message -----
  >   >   From: marc-veilleux@xxxxxxxxxxxx
  >   >   To: geocentrism@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
  >   >   Sent: Thursday, February 22, 2007 9:22 AM
  >   >   Subject: [geocentrism] Re: NASA Science
  >   >
  >   >
  >   >   Philip,
  >   >   This (see below) is an observation that infirm (i.e. contradict)
  >   >a-centrism!
  >   >   Marc V.
  >   >     ----- Message d'origine -----
  >   >     De : philip madsen
  >   >     À : geocentrism list
  >   >     Envoyé : 21 février 2007 01:44
  >   >     Objet : [geocentrism] NASA Science
  >   >
  >   >
  >   >     NASA Science News for February 20, 2007
  >   >     One pole of the sun is cooler than the other. That's the
  >surprising
> >conclusion just announced by scientists who have been analyzing data 
  >from
  >   >the ESA-NASA Ulysses spacecraft.
  >   >
  >   >     Silly moos, heat rises.. of course the bottom pole will be
  >cooler...
  >   >
  >   >     Phil
  >   >
  >   >
  >   >
  >
> >------------------------------------------------------------------------------ 
  >   >
  >   >
  >   >   No virus found in this incoming message.
  >   >   Checked by AVG Free Edition.
  >   >   Version: 7.5.441 / Virus Database: 268.18.3/696 - Release Date:
  >   >21/02/2007 3:19 PM
  >
  >
  >
  >
  >
  >   --
  >   No virus found in this incoming message.
  >   Checked by AVG Free Edition.
  >   Version: 7.5.441 / Virus Database: 268.18.3/699 - Release Date:
  >23/02/2007 1:26 PM
  >





  --
  No virus found in this incoming message.
  Checked by AVG Free Edition.
Version: 7.5.441 / Virus Database: 268.18.3/699 - Release Date: 23/02/2007 1:26 PM

Other related posts:

  1. Home
  2. geocentrism
  3. Archive
  4. 02-2007