[geocentrism] Re: Regner concedes?

  • From: Paul Deema <paul_deema@xxxxxxxxxxx>
  • To: geocentrism@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
  • Date: Fri, 9 Nov 2007 14:59:09 +0000 (GMT)

Jack L
Perhaps so, but the request was not for results of original research, just five 
points which you personally perceive to be compelling.
Paul D

----- Original Message ----
From: Jack Lewis <jack.lewis@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
To: geocentrism@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Sent: Friday, 9 November, 2007 2:22:41 PM
Subject: [geocentrism] Re: Regner concedes?

Yes I did - seeing is believing. 
There was no point in me giving any others because, as I have said previously, 
I get my information from others just as you and Regner do. Is that OK?
----- Original Message ----- 
From: Paul Deema 
To: geocentrism@xxxxxxxxxxxxx 
Sent: Friday, November 09, 2007 1:52 PM
Subject: [geocentrism] Re: Regner concedes?

Jack L
Yes -- me again!
I don't know if anyone has kept count but my recollection is that the total 
count of formal points proposed by all parties can't exceed about a dozen and I 
think it's less. eg Jack, I don't recall a single point from you. Am I correct?
Paul D

National Bingo Night. Play along for the chance to win $10,000 every week. 
Download your gamecard now at Yahoo!7 TV. 

Other related posts: