Philip M It is a curve! Look at the scale on the 'y' axis -- it's logarithmic. But I suspect you are winding me up! |[:-) Philip, in you comment to Allen D, you remark on my 'nit-picking' of your posts. I only do this where the error gives rise to ambiguity -- I want to know what you mean. I've found it safer to assume that people mean what they say, rather than assessing their statement to mean something which they did not say. Paul D ----- Original Message ---- From: philip madsen <pma15027@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> To: geocentrism@xxxxxxxxxxxxx Sent: Wednesday, 21 March, 2007 3:38:49 AM Subject: [geocentrism] Re: Question begging You originally called it a curve.. I nearly called back that it would have to be a straight line.. Now apologise for your clerical disfunction.. LOL.. Grin and all that Phil. ----- Original Message ----- From: Paul Deema To: Geocentrism@xxxxxxxxxxxxx Sent: Wednesday, March 21, 2007 6:40 AM Subject: [geocentrism] Re: Question begging To all I recently suggested that a graphing exercise of orbits using HC vs GC data might be instructive. For those few among you who may have been too busy |[-:) I've done it for you -- see attachment. Paul D Send instant messages to your online friends http://au.messenger.yahoo.com