[geocentrism] Re: Question begging

  • From: "philip madsen" <pma15027@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
  • To: <geocentrism@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
  • Date: Tue, 20 Mar 2007 06:27:36 +1000

"But the reality is a presumption in both cases".

The reality is fixed, but the perception of that reality by humans
is variable ( correct or incorrect ).

Bernie

Yep.. I should have said that what they think or call their reality based on 
what each of them can see or observe or measure, is a presumption in both 
cases, even if one of them is lucky enough to be true. 

Now following on, even though My God is real and he tells me that my world is 
static, this cannot be accepted scientifically by a Paul who has no God, as he 
is also confronted by the man on B who tells him the exact same thing that it 
is his world that is static, and that A's God is false. 

Allen is trying to co-erce Paul to accept his word, as the word of God, as an 
acceptable proof that this world is static, without any valid scientific reason 
to support this position. Not even a reasonable theory, because Allen presumes 
that Gods word is all that is needed to support the illusion he has in front of 
his eyes. 

Isn't that true Allen? And that will not work..  God had to send Ananias to 
take the scales from Pauls eyes before he was able to SEE ...."who rose up and 
was baptised, and received the Holy Ghost."

Philip. 

Other related posts: