[geocentrism] Re: Proof of heliocentrism

  • From: Allen Daves <allendaves@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
  • To: geocentrism@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
  • Date: Sat, 24 May 2008 17:53:25 -0700 (PDT)

It is so simple I can demonstrate changes in acceleration in any and every 
Reference frame i can create or test...however your assertions that 
accelerations in free fall cannot be detected are not based on any thing in the 
lab ..it is only your imagination.....you must first demonstrate your positions 
before you claim your assumptions as proof of your assertions...... The logical 
contradictions are all yours...you canot demonstrate anything without first 
assuming your conclusions...where as we do not have any problems with taking 
data for what it is.....Again you must first demonstrate via a observation that 
the observation you wish to consider as a illusion is in fact a illusion first 
.....it is not logical to first assume it is a illusion and the use that 
assumption to interpret which observations you take as face value and which 
ones you take as "illusions"
Your so wrong Paul and it is very sad that  you don’t seem even capable seeing 
your own inconsistencies.....i don't have a problem with what is shown in the 
lab..the problem is  .....the only things you attempt to use from the lab do 
not support your positions unless you first assume the very conclusions you are 
attempting to validate with those observations from the "lab" . You use your 
assumptions to interpret the data that tell you exactly what you want to 
here!?.......I find it humorous however sad that you cant see that you nor 
Regener never actually demonstrate anything. You Like Regner simply make 
assertions that make perfect sense but only if you assume the very conclusions 
you are trying to reach first!? Otherwise the things you can show at face value 
show a motionless earth centered universe…..because as I have already 
demonstrated accelerations even in free fall no mater what Physics construct 
you take can and are detected…..You
 nor Regner have any place to hide in these debates……..so go think about it and 
come up with something coherent and consistent that can demonstrate a logical 
path to it’s conclusion that I have never heard before…

----- Original Message ----
From: Paul Deema <paul_deema@xxxxxxxxxxx>
To: geocentrism@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Sent: Saturday, May 24, 2008 1:43:30 AM
Subject: [geocentrism] Re: Proof of heliocentrism

Allen D
You said -
.....i perfere what can be demonstrated in the lab not the logical 
contridictions of nonsense and fool myself into beliving it is somehow 
more reasonable!? 
Yeu preffer a dimenstrushrn in thr labratty butt diselebive w hen it'''''s nud 
feel seize inda reele welrd!?!?!?!? What a contridtcion inn terims! A vetrible 
reservibel fo logacle sartintee .!.!.!.!.! a xempel fo cornfussed logacel miss 
aopilkatoin for gottin fings bakedrs cas of wot yew wonnerd toobee rite inna 
frest plase! Hah!? Reeeely!?
Paul D

----- Original Message ----
From: Allen Daves <allendaves@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
To: geocentrism@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Sent: Friday, 23 May, 2008 11:39:22 PM
Subject: [geocentrism] Re: Proof of heliocentrism

Get the name you always wanted with the new y7mail email address.

Other related posts: