[geocentrism] Re: Now Your Turn
- From: Paul Deema <paul_deema@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- To: geocentrism@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Date: Mon, 23 Jul 2007 20:48:42 +0000 (GMT)
Bernie B
To answer your challenge is orders of magnitude more difficult than deciding
what path a thrown ball will follow. I think you are being a bit greedy! |[:-)
Further, as has been pointed out many times on this forum, there never has been
offered a proof of what you ask, from even the most gifted. It is in fact equal
to proving the incorrectness of a cosmological worldview which includes a
rotating and revolving Earth with like behaving atmosphere. If the same
standards of proof are required in each case, neither will be proven. However,
I am working on a proposition which may cast some doubt.
Paul D
----- Original Message ----
From: Bernie Brauer <bbrauer777@xxxxxxxxx>
To: geocentrism@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Sent: Monday, 23 July, 2007 8:17:27 PM
Subject: [geocentrism] Now Your Turn
To any and all heliocentrists on this forum,
including Paul Deema if he is one.
Prove that a "non-rotating Earth, non-rotating atmosphere,
non-orbiting Earth, non-orbiting atmosphere"
cosmological worldview is incorrect. Without relying on any faulty mechanical
devices, circular reasoning or any shenanigans whatsoever.
Bernie
Get the Yahoo! toolbar and be alerted to new email wherever you're surfing.
Yahoo!7 Mail has just got even bigger and better with unlimited storage
on all webmail accounts.
http://au.docs.yahoo.com/mail/unlimitedstorage.html
Other related posts:
