[geocentrism] Re: Moving-Earth Deception
- From: Bernie Brauer <bbrauer777@xxxxxxxxx>
- To: geocentrism@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Date: Mon, 1 Oct 2007 16:15:57 -0700 (PDT)
Neville,
He has www.evolutionpages.com
but he doesn't want to communicate anymore:
I have better things to do than exchange e-mails with the ignorant so don't
expect another reply. Alec
Bernie
Neville Jones <njones@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
"The absence of rotating masses"?
Is this the character who wrote some stuff saying that general relativity is
based upon the "equivalence" of a gravitational field and an accelerated
platform (it is well known that for large scales, the two are not equivalent)
and therefore the centre of the universe is irrelevant? If so, he made it clear
at the end of his page that he did not relish the idea of any contradictory
feedback.
The pigeon droppings (sorry, cosmic microwave background radiation) were, of
course, being looked for and anticipated. It is hence no wonder that a
sizeable, theoretical structure is now built upon them.
Neville
www.GeocentricUniverse.com
-----Original Message-----
From: bbrauer777@xxxxxxxxx
Sent: Mon, 1 Oct 2007 13:58:14 -0700 (PDT)
Forwarded to Geocentric by Bernie
"@evolutionpages.com> wrote: Thanks for this. It is, of course, complete
nonsense. What, for example do you think of the fact that the local inertial
frame in the absence of rotating masses aligns with the CMB?
Alec
----- Original Message -----
From: Bernie Brauer
To: @evolutionpages.com
Sent: Sunday, September 30, 2007 5:10 PM
Subject: Moving-Earth Deception
Proof of Geocentric Correctness
---------------------------------
Check out the hottest 2008 models today at Yahoo! Autos.
---------------------------------
Boardwalk for $500? In 2007? Ha!
Play Monopoly Here and Now (it's updated for today's economy) at Yahoo! Games.
Other related posts:
