[geocentrism] Re: Moving-Earth Deception

  • From: Neville Jones <njones@xxxxxxxxx>
  • To: geocentrism@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
  • Date: Mon, 1 Oct 2007 14:30:03 -0800


"The absence of rotating masses"?

Is this the character who wrote some stuff saying that general relativity is based upon the "equivalence" of a gravitational field and an accelerated platform (it is well known that for large scales, the two are not equivalent) and therefore the centre of the universe is irrelevant? If so, he made it clear at the end of his page that he did not relish the idea of any contradictory feedback.

The pigeon droppings (sorry, cosmic microwave background radiation) were, of course, being looked for and anticipated. It is hence no wonder that a sizeable, theoretical structure is now built upon them.

Neville
www.GeocentricUniverse.com


-----Original Message-----
From: bbrauer777@xxxxxxxxx
Sent: Mon, 1 Oct 2007 13:58:14 -0700 (PDT)

Forwarded to Geocentric by Bernie

"@evolutionpages.com> wrote:
Thanks for this.  It is, of course, complete nonsense.  What, for example do you think of the fact that the local inertial frame in the absence of rotating masses aligns with the CMB?
 
Alec
----- Original Message -----
Sent: Sunday, September 30, 2007 5:10 PM
Subject: Moving-Earth Deception

Proof of Geocentric Correctness

Check out the hottest 2008 models today at Yahoo! Autos.

Other related posts:

  1. Home
  2. geocentrism
  3. Archive
  4. 10-2007