[geocentrism] Re: Moving-Earth Deception
- From: Bernie Brauer <bbrauer777@xxxxxxxxx>
- To: geocentrism@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Date: Mon, 1 Oct 2007 15:09:18 -0700 (PDT)
Allen,
That's very good, thanks. But also this link doesnt work:
http://fetcher.fw-notify.net/00000006031244324768/114.pdf
Bernie
allendaves@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx wrote:
Thanks for this. It is, of course, complete nonsense. What, for
example do you think of the fact that the local inertial frame (EARTH) in the
absence of rotating masses (THAT IS THE ISSUE AT HAND ...no rotating masses????
the Universe is the rotating mass!) aligns with the CMB? Cosmic background
radiation......
What does he think about the fact that there is no observable secondary
rotation in the "local reference frame" around the annual axis and yet there is
on the "local reference frame" on the daily axis.....nonsense is not a thought
that is a feeling, i want a logical explination.....or the fact that the
distribution of all observable mass is organized on shells concentric to the
"local inertial frame"..LOL....? What, for example does he think about the fact
that no one has proven that there is such a thing as a "local reference frame"
that is independent from any other "local reference frame".......Envoking a
theory to validate that theories own conclusions is called circular
fallacy........UMMM
CMB/Geocentricity issue is also covered in #114 pg131 BA
http://fetcher.fw-notify.net/00000006031244324768/114.pdf
What does he think about the fact that there is no observable secondary rotaion
in the "local reference frame" around the annual axis and yet there is on the
nightly "local reference frame" axis..or the fact that the disrstubution of all
observable mass is organised on shells concentric to the "local inertial
frame"..LOL....? or how about the fact that no one has proven that there is
such a thing as the "local reference frame that is independent of any other
"local reference frame"..in vokeing a theory to vlaidte the theroy one is
trying to invoke is called circular falicy........
----- Original Message ----
From: Bernie Brauer <bbrauer777@xxxxxxxxx>
To: geocentrism@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Sent: Monday, October 1, 2007 1:58:14 PM
Subject: [geocentrism] Re: Moving-Earth Deception
Forwarded to Geocentric by Bernie
"@evolutionpages.com> wrote: Thanks for this. It is, of course,
complete nonsense. What, for example do you think of the fact that the local
inertial frame in the absence of rotating masses aligns with the CMB?
Alec
----- Original Message -----
From: Bernie Brauer
To: @evolutionpages.com
Sent: Sunday, September 30, 2007 5:10 PM
Subject: Moving-Earth Deception
Proof of Geocentric Correctness
---------------------------------
Check out the hottest 2008 models today at Yahoo! Autos.
---------------------------------
Don't let your dream ride pass you by. Make it a reality with Yahoo! Autos.
Other related posts:
