[geocentrism] Re: Moving-Earth DECEPTION!

  • From: Neville Jones <njones@xxxxxxxxx>
  • To: geocentrism@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
  • Date: Sat, 15 Sep 2007 13:42:20 -0800

PS   I notice that one point was not made clear in my last posting,

"The second problem is that Robert, Martin, Allen, Philip and others (including myself, as you will notice from my tentative first steps in the Plenum Aether section of my updated "Geostationary satellites in a geocentric universe" paper) suggest that the gravitational 'field' is not produced by the World, but rather by the aether's interaction with the World. It is this point that addresses Dr. Regner's query about other celestial examples of gravity." In this case, the field does not emanate from the World, but from the aether, and the inverse square function is irrelevant. (In exactly the same way, my own exponential function, as an alternative, would also be irrelevant and up for reconsideration.)


From: njones@xxxxxxxxx
Sent: Sat, 15 Sep 2007 05:10:41 -0800


These are perfectly valid points ...

Free 3D Earth Screensaver - Watch the Earth right on your desktop!
Check it out at http://www.inbox.com/earth

Other related posts: