Bernie B Now you are being insulting. You really should think about conducting a character self audit. Paul D ----- Original Message ---- From: Bernie Brauer <bbrauer777@xxxxxxxxx> To: geocentrism@xxxxxxxxxxxxx Sent: Saturday, 27 October, 2007 7:17:51 PM Subject: [geocentrism] Re: Moving Earth Deception Deception Paul, I removed it totally, never to see your name there again. There is no way most "scientists" are ever going to accept the Geocentric worldview, not because they know it's not the truth, but because they are getting their income from the theoretical science establishment, but in return must not contradict their agenda. So here is the question: Who is paying you Paul Deema? Bernie Paul Deema <paul_deema@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: Bernie B I found my name in a Google search linked to your site, so I looked -- and this is what I found - Question: Prove that a "non-rotating Earth, non-rotating atmosphere, non-orbiting Earth, non-orbiting atmosphere" cosmological worldview is incorrect. Without relying on any faulty mechanical devices, circular reasoning or any shenanigans whatsoever. Answer: "There never has been offered a proof of what you ask, from even the most gifted." Paul Deema Here is the original from which you have selectively quoted - Bernie B To answer your challenge is orders of magnitude more difficult than deciding what path a thrown ball will follow. I think you are being a bit greedy! |[:-) Further, as has been pointed out many times on this forum, there never has been offered a proof of what you ask, from even the most gifted. It is in fact equal to proving the incorrectness of a cosmological worldview which includes a rotating and revolving Earth with like behaving atmosphere. If the same standards of proof are required in each case, neither will be proven. However, I am working on a proposition which may cast some doubt. Paul D ----- Original Message ---- From: Bernie Brauer <bbrauer777@xxxxxxxxx> To: geocentrism@xxxxxxxxxxxxx Sent: Monday, 23 July, 2007 8:17:27 PM Subject: [geocentrism] Now Your Turn To any and all heliocentrists on this forum, including Paul Deema if he is one. Prove that a "non-rotating Earth, non-rotating atmosphere, non-orbiting Earth, non-orbiting atmosphere" cosmological worldview is incorrect. Without relying on any faulty mechanical devices, circular reasoning or any shenanigans whatsoever. You did not ask if you might use my comments or my name. In quoting me, you did not even have the decency to make it plain that it was an excerpt such as by the use of ellipsis. I ask that you either remove this offensive misuse of my comments or include in its entirety both your question and my answer. Paul D Sick of deleting your inbox? Yahoo!7 Mail has free unlimited storage. Get it now. __________________________________________________ Do You Yahoo!? Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around http://mail.yahoo.com Sick of deleting your inbox? Yahoo!7 Mail has free unlimited storage. http://au.docs.yahoo.com/mail/unlimitedstorage.html