[geocentrism] Re: Moving Earth Deception Deception

  • From: Paul Deema <paul_deema@xxxxxxxxxxx>
  • To: geocentrism@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
  • Date: Sun, 28 Oct 2007 05:39:48 +0000 (GMT)

Bernie B
Now you are being insulting.
You really should think about conducting a character self audit. 
Paul D



----- Original Message ----
From: Bernie Brauer <bbrauer777@xxxxxxxxx>
To: geocentrism@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Sent: Saturday, 27 October, 2007 7:17:51 PM
Subject: [geocentrism] Re: Moving Earth Deception Deception


Paul,
 
I removed it totally, never to see your name there again.
There is no way most "scientists" are ever going to accept the 
Geocentric worldview, not because they know it's not the
truth, but because they are getting their income
from the theoretical science establishment, but in return
must not contradict their agenda.
So here is the question:
Who is paying you Paul Deema?
 
Bernie  


Paul Deema <paul_deema@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Bernie B
I found my name in a Google search linked to your site, so I looked -- and this 
is what I found -
Question: 
Prove that a "non-rotating Earth, non-rotating atmosphere, 
non-orbiting Earth, non-orbiting atmosphere" cosmological worldview is 
incorrect. Without relying on any faulty mechanical devices, circular reasoning 
or any shenanigans whatsoever. 
Answer: 
"There never has been offered a proof of what you ask, from even the most 
gifted." Paul Deema
Here is the original from which you have selectively quoted -
Bernie B
To answer your challenge is orders of magnitude more difficult than deciding 
what path a thrown ball will follow. I think you are being a bit greedy! |[:-) 
Further, as has been pointed out many times on this forum, there never has been 
offered a proof of what you ask, from even the most gifted. It is in fact equal 
to proving the incorrectness of a cosmological worldview which includes a 
rotating and revolving Earth with like behaving atmosphere. If the same 
standards of proof are required in each case, neither will be proven. However, 
I am working on a proposition which may cast some doubt. 
Paul D 
----- Original Message ----
From: Bernie Brauer <bbrauer777@xxxxxxxxx>
To: geocentrism@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Sent: Monday, 23 July, 2007 8:17:27 PM
Subject: [geocentrism] Now Your Turn
To any and all heliocentrists on this forum, 
including Paul Deema if he is one. 
Prove that a "non-rotating Earth, non-rotating atmosphere, 
non-orbiting Earth, non-orbiting atmosphere" 
cosmological worldview is incorrect. Without relying on any faulty mechanical 
devices, circular reasoning or any shenanigans whatsoever.
You did not ask if you might use my comments or my name. In quoting me, you did 
not even have the decency to make it plain that it was an excerpt such as by 
the use of ellipsis.
I ask that you either remove this offensive misuse of my comments or include in 
its entirety both your question and my answer.
Paul D



Sick of deleting your inbox? Yahoo!7 Mail has free unlimited storage. Get it 
now. 


__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around 
http://mail.yahoo.com


      Sick of deleting your inbox? Yahoo!7 Mail has free unlimited storage.
http://au.docs.yahoo.com/mail/unlimitedstorage.html

Other related posts: