[geocentrism] MS illogic

  • From: "Robert Bennett" <robert.bennett@xxxxxxx>
  • To: "Geocentrism" <geocentrism@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
  • Date: Fri, 27 Apr 2007 14:03:17 -0400

The subject of contradictions used by mainstream science and their followers
has been a topic explored on this forum previously.
Coincidentally, the same topic arises in a book review ? also
coincidentally - of GWW(fabp).

The analysis of the problem and its purpose could easily have been written
by yours truly.

Now, if we could only get the world to listen ?.. to logic.


the lines have been drawn
http://www.amazon.com/gp/cdp/member-reviews/A1B6FV9E3RBND9/ref=cm_pdp_review
s_see_all/002-4731938-1340061?ie=UTF8&sort%5Fby=MostRecentReview
<http://www.amazon.com/gp/cdp/member-reviews/A1B6FV9E3RBND9/ref=cm_pdp_revie
ws_see_all/002-4731938-1340061?ie=UTF8&sort%5Fby=MostRecentReview>
top

a logical farse
http://www.amazon.com/gp/cdp/member-reviews/A1B6FV9E3RBND9/002-4731938-13400
61?ie=UTF8&display=public&sort%5Fby=MostRecentReview&page=2
<http://www.amazon.com/gp/cdp/member-reviews/A1B6FV9E3RBND9/002-4731938-1340
061?ie=UTF8&display=public&sort%5Fby=MostRecentReview&page=2>
bottom


???..
Biblical revisionists scoff at discussing GS,  which they claim has no moral
importance and is a purely scientific issue.  No one goes to Hell for a HC
belief.

The issue isn?t GS, per se, but the belief in Scriptural errancy. If GS is
false?. what else in the Bible is?

The same reviewer cites many quotes from varied sources that dismiss
religion based on the alleged disproof of GS.
If the issue isn?t worth discussing, why does it aris so often?    Methinks
they doth protest too much.

a cross-section of the debate
http://www.amazon.com/gp/cdp/member-reviews/A1B6FV9E3RBND9/ref=cm_pdp_review
s_see_all/002-4731938-1340061?ie=UTF8&sort%5Fby=MostRecentReview
<http://www.amazon.com/gp/cdp/member-reviews/A1B6FV9E3RBND9/ref=cm_pdp_revie
ws_see_all/002-4731938-1340061?ie=UTF8&sort%5Fby=MostRecentReview>
bottom


Robert

Other related posts: