[geocentrism] Re: Latest NASA wild goose chase
- From: "philip madsen" <pma15027@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- To: <geocentrism@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Sun, 22 Jul 2007 16:43:10 +1000
If ET life is discovered, the answer I was taught was that God never told us
about 'them' , so they're not part of the divine salvific plan. No conflict
with the deposit of faith. Robert..
Yeah, thats what I said.. in a round about way.. But even if they discovered
life, it does not support evolution, anymore than life here on earth does..
Our God might not mention life forms, but He sure did mention He creaded the
stars in the same 6 days.. Imagine meeting the descendents of a different Adam
and Eve, one who did not fall... They've been watching us.....
Philip.
----- Original Message -----
From: Robert Bennett
To: geocentrism@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Sent: Sunday, July 22, 2007 2:18 PM
Subject: [geocentrism] Re: Latest NASA wild goose chase
I am not so game to go with the assurance of Robert re extra terrestial life.
The NASA crusade to find liquid water in space, so as to infer that ET life
was first, possible, then probable, then certain, is part of the MS modernist
agenda to coronate evolution as our scientific idol - the modern Baal. US
public schools must only teach the approved religion of biology - Darwinism.
So desperate are the modernists that they will probably find some microbes in
space that were accidentally spread on the Moon and via space probes, and claim
they have proof of ET life.
That was my point, Sir Philip.
I recall clearly the nuns telling all the kids, that man would find no life
in space. except the devil.
Of course I laughed, and when Sputnik arrived, I cheered.. Nuns of course
said it was the Devils work, and it being communist, I suppose they were close.
Yet I clearly remember a statement from the vatican of the time , which might
have been modernist inspired of course, that if any life were to appear, it
would be outside of revelation, and not of this world.. But this did not
preclude Gods right to have created other life. There followed a short
explanation of what such forms this creation would take, even unto intelligent
life, whether it be angels or devils or sentient beings such as ourselves..
Were such beings in existence, they had no place in the mission of Christs
church, having no relation to the fallen progeny of Adam.
In essence they covered their behinds.. Which I thought clever. so will I.
Off on one of your verbal riffs again?? Well, since you brought it up -
If ET life is discovered, the answer I was taught was that God never told us
about 'them' , so they're not part of the divine salvific plan. No conflict
with the deposit of faith.
When asked if I believe in alien life visiting Earth, the answer depends on
the def of 'alien'.
There was Christ and the angels of Scripture, for sure.
And Enoch and Elias, who will return to die fighting the Antichrist. But
they were born here.
For any other 'humans' to visit us, they would have to be physically
descended from Adam and saved by Christ.
I'm sure that the Auschurch has a different spin from the Amchurch on this.
Robert B
PS. Sometimes I wonder if Allen is an ET. He types in strange coded
languages and always talks about his Martian friend. Just change the l to an I
Allen è Alien J
Philip.
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
No virus found in this incoming message.
Checked by AVG Free Edition.
Version: 7.5.476 / Virus Database: 269.10.12/910 - Release Date: 21/07/2007
3:52 PM
Other related posts:
