[geocentrism] Re: Geosynchronous Satellites in a Geostationary Universe
- From: Allen Daves <allendaves@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- To: geocentrism@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Date: Mon, 4 Jun 2007 10:59:27 -0700 (PDT)
"To discard Newton is to force a re-structuring of physics"
Funny, NASA cant get Newton to explain pioneer 10 or 11 or even get anything
to work using Newton exclusively (error factor of 1.11 parts in 300) and if not
Newton exclusively then not exclusively Newton!...:) ..Dare I even go so far as
to say Newton not at all if other fudge factors must be part of the
calculations under consideration. Why not something all together different? If
not why not? One can claim Newton has a close description of reality, however,
nowhere did even Newton himself claim certainly of the reality of how or why
his own descriptions even work......"Re-structuring of physics" Yes, that is
exactly what has been going on........not sure where he is in his
understanding..... What is suggested is a difference in that change due to
different reasons for that re-structuring not the fact that restructuring is
1. Nessisary in light of "real" O&E not just imaginary ones, regardless of
what side of the fence you sit on..
2. Is presently going on even now..?
Bernie Brauer <bbrauer777@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: Fwd, I need ideas to comment
back to this doubter. bb
----------------
Gary
Bernie,
To discard Newton is to force a re-structuring of physics. Let me know when
his complete refutation & replacement of the PRINCIPIA is in print. Also, send
me links to a few reviews in the scientific journals on physics.
Gary
_________
----- Original Message -----
From: Bernie
To: Gary
Sent: Saturday, June 02, 2007 11:22 AM
Subject: Geosynchronous Satellites in a Geostationary Universe
Gary,
Did you get this?
http://www.geocentricperspective.com/geosat.pdf
Bernard P. Brauer
---------------------------------
---------------------------------
Take the Internet to Go: Yahoo!Go puts the Internet in your pocket: mail,
news, photos & more.
Other related posts:
