[geocentrism] Re: Evolution

  • From: "philip madsen" <pma15027@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
  • To: <geocentrism@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
  • Date: Sat, 22 Sep 2007 08:50:33 +1000

Paul said..  

T. Rex and his collegues have been extinct for around 65,000,000 years.

How do you know that? There is evidence in the fossil footprints  of man and 
this beast together ..  And anyhow we cannot dispense with the Loch Ness 
monster altogether..  Be fair Paul..  65million years? 

Philip  
  ----- Original Message ----- 
  From: Paul Deema 
  To: geocentrism@xxxxxxxxxxxxx 
  Sent: Saturday, September 22, 2007 12:00 AM
  Subject: [geocentrism] Re: Evolution


  Jack L
  Let's strike a bargain. I asked first -- why do you think the second law of 
thermodynamics precludes the possibility of abiogenesis and/or evolution?
  You'll note that I have made an effort to read your references and answer 
your questions. So far I don't think you have made any attempt to reciprocate. 
You have attempted to talk down to me, you have strongly intimated that I am 
ignorant of anything to do with evolution, and adversely contrasted my level of 
understanding with yours. Frankly, I see why others, especially Richard D, 
don't want to debate with you.
  See From Paul Deema Wed Sep 12 16:59:30 2007
    I'll try to read all of the response to Point 9 by tomorrow night's efforts 
but perhaps you will favour me by then with your ideas about the Second Law of 
Thermodynamics and how you see its pronouncements proving the non occurrence of 
abiogenesis and/or evolution.

  Concerning your response to my post which referred to blood clotting cascade 
-- I have apologise to you -- you did respond. I found it in my Spam Bin along 
with my outgoing post mentioning the post in question. Apparently, the net 
nanny dislikes one of those site urls you provided. This post also contained 
this little outburst -
    Your firm conviction about T-Rex and DNA ignores the evidence. This 
evidence is disputed by scientists who are as blinkered as you are. For them to 
accept that the DNA is real will completely undermine all their beliefs and 
work and therefore it must be ridiculed as much as possible.
  T. Rex and his collegues have been extinct for around 65,000,000 years. There 
is just no way DNA is involved or it is as I suggested -- hoax, fraud, or 
conspiracy.
  You really should stop second guessing what other people's motivation might 
be and suggesting that I am blinkered is the latest in a lengthening list of 
insults you've directed at me. I ask you to cease this practice and instead 
debate the issue with some decorum.
  And from the fifth post on this subject from you in less than two hours we 
have -
    A question for Paul. Do you think it is OK for this kind of thing to happen 
or would you dismiss it as an isolated case or even evolutionists are not 
perfect?
  My answer is contained in my response to Martin S.
  Paul D

  ----- Original Message ----
  From: Jack Lewis <jack.lewis@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
  To: geocentrism@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
  Sent: Friday, 21 September, 2007 11:03:38 AM
  Subject: [geocentrism] Re: Evolution


  Dear Paul,
  When is an argument merely gainsaying and when is it a spirited discussion?
  Accepting that you do not want to respond to the rest of James' post, how 
about just addressing the comment he made in red?

  Jack 



------------------------------------------------------------------------------
  Sick of deleting your inbox? Yahoo!7 Mail has free unlimited storage. Get it 
now. 


------------------------------------------------------------------------------


  No virus found in this incoming message.
  Checked by AVG Free Edition. 
  Version: 7.5.487 / Virus Database: 269.13.27/1020 - Release Date: 20/09/2007 
12:07 PM

Other related posts: