[geocentrism] Re: Earth gravity static or time dependent?

  • From: allendaves@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
  • To: geocentrism@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
  • Date: Tue, 18 Sep 2007 19:56:19 -0700 (PDT)

I leaving shortly for a short trip ill be back late Thursday or Friday Lord 
willing. However to address your question in short ..we can discuss this in 
more detail when I get back …..based on the apparent interaction (transfer of 
energy/force efficiency) of aether and mass and visa vers ie Aseden 
effect…gravitational slingshots and such…taking into account the presumed 
“density” of the aether,… the "known" mass and mass distribution patterns 
observable within the universe  a few Ukn variables such as the size of the 
Aether(universe)  ….I suggest not only is a vibration with a active and 
reactive matix the most logical and demons ratable solution but  it is the 
frequency necessary to produce the attached ……just like something you can 
produce on a sound board with sand the only difference is a 3 matrix (aether) 
rather then just the 2d of a sound board……    



----- Original Message ----
From: philip madsen <joyphil@xxxxxxxxxxx>
To: geocentrism@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Sent: Tuesday, September 18, 2007 5:31:29 PM
Subject: [geocentrism] Re: Earth gravity static or time dependent?


Allen I know that in the past I have tended to disagree if not just avoid your 
vibrational universe. This may have been a communication problem of my own. I 
do not like calling Light electromagnetic waves having the same theoretical 
structure as radio for instance. Can anyone demonstrate an electrical current 
at light frequencies for example, as they can do with radio frequencies?  I 
think not. Light might be corpuscular, radio is not.   Light might be photons, 
radio is not. I say "might" because I doubt it. 
 
Hence, likewise vibration. I do not like the use of the term vibration in any 
context other than as something physically felt.. pressure sound.  I would 
never call a 60hz electrical current flow  a vibration, except by way of 
analogy. eg the electrons vibrate longitudinally in the conductor. 
 
But on re reading your words I get the impression you use the term for all 
types of cyclic variations, in anything, be it pressure, mechanical, electrical 
etc. Perhaps you are calling any single cycle sinisoidal or non sinisoidal, 
event that has a frequency of one year or a hundred years, a vibration...I 
wouldn't, but if you are doing so, then perhaps I can agree with you as regards 
the aether having a frequency. Nay, perhaps even several different cyclic 
events as effects on matter, due to interveneing forces in matter itself.
 
Having cleared that up, I can now see what you are driving at, re the aether 
pressure (gravity) "squeezing" the water of the oceans towards the moon because 
the moon interferes with this aetheric "pressure" on its side of the earth.  
But I see this effect without need of any "vibration".  
 
If you are saying the aether itself has a basic frequency of "vibration" , what 
structure does this cycle have, and what is its frequency? Why cannot this 
gravity pressure be a static constant in a given location, just as is and for 
the same reason water pressure in a pond, is static. 
 
This water pressure phenomenon is transmitted via the molecular/nuclear 
"vibrations" , but the vibrations are not the cause of the strength of the 
pressure. Likewise perhaps you might agree is the aether..  I can get that.  
But you are assuming what all do, and which may be incorrect, nay most probably 
incorrect, that the aether has the properties of a material substance. 
 
Back to Harold Aspden...  the aether is a simple neutral state of electrical 
charges which without intervening environment , demonstrate no external 
material measurable effect. .  eg when we make an electrical current flow, we 
disturb these charges balance, and create a magnetic force stress. 
 
Philip. 
 
 
 
----- Original Message ----- 
From: allendaves@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx 
To: geocentrism@xxxxxxxxxxxxx 
Sent: Wednesday, September 19, 2007 4:42 AM
Subject: [geocentrism] Re: Earth gravity static or time dependent?


I dont know how many are familar with this reasearch ...however it is/ has 
implications for extropolating data from aether (gravity) i 
belive.................
 
I believe this relatively new approach which shows some interesting promise 
although appears to be an attempt to "revise" STR could eventually be very 
usefull for extropolating aether gravititaional properties..........Because I 
suggest a vibrational aetheral gravitational model where the "field" sqeezes 
the earth (tides) and roates with the aether with periods/ interfence due at 
least in part  to the postions other celestial bodies na the roational peroid 
of the universe itself.............. this could be very valuable "mirco 
gravitational" data......good reasearch i think......thus far.....
 
  http://www.dynamicgravity.org/p1/doc/index.htm 
 
http://www.dynamicgravity.org/





No virus found in this incoming message.
Checked by AVG Free Edition. 
Version: 7.5.487 / Virus Database: 269.13.22/1013 - Release Date: 17/09/2007 
1:29 PM

Attachment: 1hour presentation.jpg
Description: image/pjpeg

Other related posts: