[geocentrism] Re: Earth and science

  • From: <marc-veilleux@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
  • To: "Geocentric" <geocentrism@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
  • Date: Thu, 23 Aug 2007 19:56:04 -0400

Thank you Paul for the information.  However, we have good reasons to believe 
that both HC and GC could be symmetrical and geometrically interchangeable.  
So, no matter how many proofs you find to confirm your theory (HC), it doesn't 
prove the theory is true!  I am not aware of any proof that prove GC to be 

I know that in the mind of many scientists (and probably in yours), HC is a 
fact, not a theory that could be false!  But this is due to a state of 
confusion between beliefs and facts.
Marc V.

----- Original Message -----
From: Paul Deema
Sent: 23 août 2007 09:55
To: Geocentrism@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: [geocentrism] Re: Earth and science

Marc V
I can't address all of them but I'll have a go at one.
3) The accurately charted paths of numerous space probes which have  
visited all 8 planets in the solar system.  I don't see where is the problem 
for GC!
The people who plan these missions depend on the approx 66000mph velocity of 
the Earth in its orbit for success. If it wasn't there then such missions would 
all fail. Additionally, I don't think any vehicle is even capable of achieving 
just 66000mph let alone 66000 + 25000mph.
Paul D

Feel safe with award winning spam protection on Yahoo!7 Mail. Find out more.  

Other related posts: