To prove it take a camera and spin it at 23.44 degrees subtended to
the perpendicular. now spin the camera 365 times on the 23.44 degree
axis for every one time that the whole apparatus is rotated 360
degrees .........this will adequately demonstrate the effect and since
the observers scale /(observers distance from axis of rotation)/ makes
no difference and we would be using actual stars at actual distances
there can be no protest of scale......
All is well in the house of the Geocentric
Universe.............ahhhhhhhhh......:)
*/Allen Daves <allendaves@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>/* wrote:
Not to dispare..you see it does not matter ..why? ..because the
nightly moves through 360 degress 365 times for ever 1 anual
rotation so the observer is at some point all through out the 365
nights is going to be in rotaion about the anual axis in all 360
degreess ......there will be a star trail but only on the nightly
axis everything as stated previously still applies.. and it would
all be a big blur.....but we already have that photo available to
us.....it is not blured at all by stars tracing out multiple paths
simoltaniously...
*/j a <ja_777_aj@xxxxxxxxx>/* wrote:
Everybody,
I see a potential problem we need to consider in developing
the dual axis proof, which potentially could render it
unusable. From an A-centric position, basically it is this: On
the nightly star trail the observer is moving along the axis
of rotation, therefore the view of the axis doesn't change. On
the annual star trail the observer is moving along a path that
is 23.5 degrees off of the axis of rotation. This means that
the observers view of the axis is changing by the same amount
that a particular star moves around that axis, therefore
negating the motion, making it appear to be motionless.
Now if this is true, then to test whether the annual star
trail exists, the observer would have to travel north or south
by a certain number of degrees for each successive observation
such that his path remains on the axis of rotation in
question. The problem here is that if we did this we would be
reversing the problem and should expect to see an annual trail
even if Geo-centrism were the truth because we would be
observing based on a created axis.
Any axis we create will show what we should expect it to
whether AC or GC is the actual truth.
What does everyone think? I'm depressed.
JA
__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around
http://mail.yahoo.com
