Since the dual-shaft experiment was (in my view rightly) discounted as
never having been performed, the question involves only the two 50-lb.
steel balls on the 4,250-ft. cables that were diverging in the single
Tamarack mineshaft.
Perhaps one outside-the-box explanation is worth considering. Gold
foil electrometers on the earth's surface always diverge. It was
assumed that there was an existing electrostatic potential at the
earth's surface that caused this effect. One of the first experiments
taken up in the Montpelier hot-air balloon was just such a gold foil
electrometer, sent aloft with the expectation that the leaves would
relax and become parallel as altitude increased. But the higher the
balloon went, the more the leaves diverged -- there was more potential
higher up (it's at several million volts at the earth's surface). When
you consider Tesla's discovery that the Earth already had sufficient
electrical energy stored in it to cause it to vibrate electrically, it
appears quite plausible that the two cables functioned as an extended
electrometer, and that the charge distributed along the two 4,250-ft.
cables were sufficient to cause the balls to diverge. Such an
electrostatic effect, leveraging the potential difference between top
and bottom of the shaft, would not be direction-specific, as were the
centrifugal force and magnetic force explanations that Dr. Simanek
toyed with and showed to be wanting. There is more than sufficient
available force to cause the observed divergence.
Martin
On Oct 10, 2007, at 1:42 PM, Steven Jones wrote:
_/*Dear All,*/_
I was contacted by someone recently through our website who told me
that we almost have things right concerning the cosmos, only what
we’ve been taught is actually the complete inverse of reality.
Essentially, he was advocating a hollow Earth, concave in nature.
Now had this have been the past I probably would have immediately
rejected such a notion, but I went to a site he linked me too
(http://www.angelfire.com/il/geocosmos/) and the picture startled me
a little. I then did my own research, and was rather surprised that
there is a considerable amount of real science and mathematics that
support it along with some disturbing experiments that science has
tried to silence. Take a look at the Tamarack Mines Mystery for
example (http://www.lhup.edu/~dsimanek/hollow/tamarack.htm
<http://www.lhup.edu/%7Edsimanek/hollow/tamarack.htm>), the obvious
conclusion to be deduced from two 4250 ft plumb lines diverging at
the bottom of a mine shaft is that the Earth isn’t convex.
But to be perfectly truthful I don’t actually feel comfortable with
the idea much, it has a few merits I suppose, but it’s not as
beautiful as what we’ve described
(www.geocentricperspective.com/page10.htm
<http://www.geocentricperspective.com/page10.htm>) I feel, maybe just
because it’s nice to feel a “starry canopy” up above much like a
child would describe it. Also it’s a bit of a deception, however it
is possible to argue too that from a child’s perspective the convex
Earth is a deception also.
The concave Earth in it's favour does probably harmonize more with
Genesis chapter one than the conventional Earth though I suppose,
because God doesn’t record creating a universe, only the Earth. So we
have this nucleus of life if you like, living inside of a highly
protective shell, like a womb. Distant loved ones in this strange
concept are actually up and away behind the stars! Maybe also it
explains why long-range radio theory does not work as expected,
because transmissions received here in Britain from Australia simply
travel across!
I was seeking to disprove the concave Earth and if you have any
suggestions that would be most appreciated. If your interested in
reading more about this idea, one of the best books is "The Cellular
Cosmogony" available for download from
http://www.sacred-texts.com/earth/cc/ It's best from about chapter 20
"Tests That Cannot Be Ignored" onwards I think. Happy thinking!
/*Best Wishes,
*/
/*Steven.*/
--------
Martin G. Selbrede
Chief Scientist
Uni-Pixel Displays, Inc.
8708 Technology Forest Place, Suite 100
The Woodlands, TX 77381
281-825-4500 main line (281) 825-4507 direct line (281) 825-4599 fax
(512) 422-4919 cell
mselbrede@xxxxxxxxxxxxx <mailto:mselbrede@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> /
martin.selbrede@xxxxxxxxxxxx <mailto:martin.selbrede@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
