[geocentrism] Re: Don't Laugh!
- From: "Jack Lewis" <jack.lewis@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
- To: <geocentrism@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Wed, 10 Oct 2007 21:10:15 +0100
Dear Steven,
I'll have a look at the links but in the mean time why does each paragraph in
your e-mail start with what looks like programming jargon?
Jack
----- Original Message -----
From: Steven Jones
To: geocentrism@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Sent: Wednesday, October 10, 2007 7:42 PM
Subject: [geocentrism] Don't Laugh!
Dear All,
<!--[if !supportEmptyParas]--><!--[endif]--> I was contacted by someone
recently through our website who told me that we almost have things right
concerning the cosmos, only what we've been taught is actually the complete
inverse of reality. Essentially, he was advocating a hollow Earth, concave in
nature.
<!--[if !supportEmptyParas]--><!--[endif]--> Now had this have been the past
I probably would have immediately rejected such a notion, but I went to a site
he linked me too (http://www.angelfire.com/il/geocosmos/) and the picture
startled me a little. I then did my own research, and was rather surprised that
there is a considerable amount of real science and mathematics that support it
along with some disturbing experiments that science has tried to silence. Take
a look at the Tamarack Mines Mystery for example
(http://www.lhup.edu/~dsimanek/hollow/tamarack.htm), the obvious conclusion to
be deduced from two 4250 ft plumb lines diverging at the bottom of a mine shaft
is that the Earth isn't convex.
<!--[if !supportEmptyParas]--><!--[endif]--> But to be perfectly truthful I
don't actually feel comfortable with the idea much, it has a few merits I
suppose, but it's not as beautiful as what we've described
(www.geocentricperspective.com/page10.htm) I feel, maybe just because it's nice
to feel a "starry canopy" up above much like a child would describe it. Also
it's a bit of a deception, however it is possible to argue too that from a
child's perspective the convex Earth is a deception also.
<!--[if !supportEmptyParas]--><!--[endif]-->The concave Earth in it's favour
does probably harmonize more with Genesis chapter one than the conventional
Earth though I suppose, because God doesn't record creating a universe, only
the Earth. So we have this nucleus of life if you like, living inside of a
highly protective shell, like a womb. Distant loved ones in this strange
concept are actually up and away behind the stars! Maybe also it explains why
long-range radio theory does not work as expected, because transmissions
received here in Britain from Australia simply travel across!
<!--[if !supportEmptyParas]--><!--[endif]-->I was seeking to disprove the
concave Earth and if you have any suggestions that would be most appreciated.
If your interested in reading more about this idea, one of the best books is
"The Cellular Cosmogony" available for download from
http://www.sacred-texts.com/earth/cc/ It's best from about chapter 20 "Tests
That Cannot Be Ignored" onwards I think. Happy thinking!
Best Wishes,
Steven.
Other related posts:
