[geocentrism] Re: Corrected Goofs
- From: "philip madsen" <pma15027@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- To: <geocentrism@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Fri, 19 Dec 2008 07:14:24 +1000
OK Allen, but you still did not answer.. Is the motor rotor and disc attached
FREE to rotate, and NOT locked to the stator... a very important point just
to make sure we start identical positions.. Phil
----- Original Message -----
From: allendaves@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To: geocentrism@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Sent: Friday, December 19, 2008 6:56 AM
Subject: [geocentrism] Corrected Goofs
The de-energised, non rotating motor IS the condition that existed
before it starts to orbit AND after the orbit is stoped......Thus, the only
claim that we can logicaly lay claim to is that its condition was non
energised and non rotating during the orbit.. this is particulaly true since we
can know beyond all dout when and when the motor is and is not
energised......Note: of the two motors, only in the motor that is energised and
in rotation before the orbit can the motions be isolated from each other such
that we can in fact demonstrate two separte motions rather then just claiming
that two motions exist when only one can be demonstrated.... This is
demonstrated by stoping the orbit and observing the motions.....otherwise one
can only imagine a second motion not demonstrate two different
motions.........and if they are not different motions then you can't logicaly
claim "two of one"..............
--- On Thu, 12/18/08, Allen Daves <allendaves@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
From: Allen Daves <allendaves@xxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Corrected Goofs
To: geocentrism@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Date: Thursday, December 18, 2008, 12:51 PM
The de-energised, non rotating motor IS the condition that
existed before it starts to orbit AND after the orbit is stoped......Thus, the
only claim that we can logicaly lay claim to is that its condition was non
energised and non rotating during the orbit.. this is particulaly true since we
can know beyond all dout when and when the motor is and is not
energised......Note: of the two motors, only in the motor that is energised and
in rotation before the orbit can the motions be isolated from each other such
that we can in fact demonstrate two separte motions rather then just claiming
that two motions exist when only one can be demonstrated.... This is
demonstrated by stoping the orbit and observing the motions.....otherwise one
can only imagine the motion not demonstrate the motion..This is the key......
--- On Thu, 12/18/08, philip madsen <pma15027@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
wrote:
From: philip madsen <pma15027@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: [geocentrism] Re: Corrected Goofs
To: geocentrism@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Date: Thursday, December 18, 2008, 12:39 PM
OK now this is exactly how I took your meaning originally..
So now one more question before I respond .. that needs stating. Is this
de-energised, non rotating motor the condition as exists at the very beginning
before the bottom disc is made to rotate? ie everything is stationary, and the
motor rotor with disc is free to move? Very important this is answered
clearly.
Phil
----- Original Message -----
From: allendaves@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To: geocentrism@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Sent: Friday, December 19, 2008 3:38 AM
Subject: [geocentrism] Corrected Goofs
Here are the corrected diagrams....
--- On Thu, 12/18/08, Allen Daves
<allendaves@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
From: Allen Daves <allendaves@xxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Corrected Goofs
To: geocentrism@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Date: Thursday, December 18, 2008, 9:37 AM
Here are the corrected diagrams....
--- On Thu, 12/18/08, allendaves@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
<allendaves@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
From: allendaves@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
<allendaves@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: [geocentrism] Goofs
To: geocentrism@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Date: Thursday, December 18, 2008, 9:06 AM
Yes, should read " It is a fact that this motor
will keep the same face to the centre dot at all times.."
I will fix that and the murcury references in
the diagrams as well.....
--- On Thu, 12/18/08, Allen Daves
<allendaves@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
From: Allen Daves <allendaves@xxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Goofs
To: geocentrism@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Date: Thursday, December 18, 2008, 7:06 AM
Yes, should read " It is a fact that this motor
will keep the same face to the centre dot at all times.."
I will fix that and the murcury references in
the diagrams as well.....
--- On Wed, 12/17/08, philip madsen
<pma15027@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
From: philip madsen <pma15027@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: [geocentrism] Goofs
To: "geocentrism list"
<geocentrism@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Wednesday, December 17, 2008, 11:37 PM
Allen did you goof or did I?
At the time I thought it was a typo mistake,
and I must have taken it the wrong way..
So therefore could you please correct the
sentence in your diagram to say what you meant..
You said, It is a fact that this motor will it
will keep the same face to the centre dot at all time..
Will you please correct the blunder of
confusion marked in red, and rewrite below the full sentence as you meant it...
I asumed the "will it" bit was somthing your fingers did while your brain was
away.and I left it out of the context. But given your reaction, I must of
goofed.. thanks.
Phil.
Other related posts:
