[geocentrism] Re: Concave model

  • From: Bernie Brauer <bbrauer777@xxxxxxxxx>
  • To: geocentrism@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
  • Date: Tue, 30 Oct 2007 08:23:43 -0700 (PDT)

The whole thing was a parody of how current
  heliocentrists sometimes view Geocentrists.
   
  Sheesh.
   
  Bernie

Paul Deema <paul_deema@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
        Bernie B   
  I'm always curious -- "World Geocentric Institute" -- intriguing! Didn't 
produce one Goole hit. Did I/you spell it incorrectly?
  Paul D
  

  ----- Original Message ----
From: Bernie Brauer <bbrauer777@xxxxxxxxx>
To: geocentrism@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Sent: Tuesday, 30 October, 2007 1:40:53 PM
Subject: [geocentrism] Re: Concave model

  Steven,
   
  I'm sorry, I cannot consider your loony Concave Earth Theory to be
  valid or worth investigating. I have 28 years tied up researching
  and believing in Geocentrism, so effectively if your theory
  were true, that would be like saying I have "wasted" my life pursuing
  the wrong course.
  In addition if my belief in Geocentrism were proven incorrect
  I would become a laughing stock amongst the entire community,
  and the thousands of my Geocentrism converts would be angry at me.
   
  I make a good income here at The World Geocentric Institute
  which enables a very comfortable and joyful lifestyle. If the Executive 
Director
  of our institute found me promoting your wild, ridiculous
  and unsubstantiated Concave Earth theory, I dare say I should find
  my office moved to the bathroom or very likely dismissed from my position.
   
  Kind Regards,
  Bernie         : ~ )   

Steven Jones <steven@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
  Hi Bernie,

Interesting questions, but the concave Earth model is not so easily disproven. 
There is actually real maths and science behind it, but before I continue I 
must stress that I don't accept this model as being true presently, I'm only 
investigating it with an open-mind! If you think I'm a loony for doing so then 
don't hesitate to say so! But it's interesting, and worth a look I think.

Yes, you probably could hit the sun, although with much more difficulty than 
what you may at first realize. Essential to the concave Earth model is the fact 
that light is not straight, and gravity may be the same (I don't know, but 
probably). If light could be proven to be curved as this model supposes, then 
it would kill heliocentrism which relies heavily on the fact that light is 
"straight".

Concerning your next question, this is actually easy. Light is curved, 
therefore try and visualize how sunrise and sunset work. These illustrations of 
summer and winter may help too:



Notice the curved light, imagine being at the last point on the bottom, that 
would be just like sunset.

Finally, you may find the following of note, it was written by a friend of mine:


"As I explained to the webmaster of the concave earth theory, I had come to  
that conclusion myself before ever seeing their website.  The starry sky had  a 
lot to do with it.  The first time I went to the planetarium and   watched a  
star show that seemed every bit as real as what was outside.  At the end of  
the show the planetarium ball with lights raised up out of the pit where it  
had been hidden and the announcer described what we had just seen as an  
illusion.  Lights projected onto the domed ceiling.  Wow.  Then we left and  
outside the stars lit the sky and looked exactly as what we had seen inside.  
How could a dome be over the earth as we know it?  Years later as I was  
cleaning our pool at night and using a flashlight to see if the bottom was  
clean, I noticed that the beam of light was shining up on the house.  
Diffraction.  Light waves do not continue in a straight line when passing  
through a liquid medium such as the atmosphere.  When I took my kids to the 
 beach to skip stones on the water I noticed that the horizon of lake Ontario  
came to eye level whether we were at the shoreline or on the bluff above.  Then 
when I was in an airplane on a business trip   I also noticed that   the  
horizon was at eye level on both sides of the plane, no matter how high we  
went.  The only way this could happen is if we were in a concave earth.  Try  
it yourself.  Plus, if we were on a convex earth, the atmosphere would be  
sucked away into the vacuum of space.    Anyway, science "so called" is a false 
religion.  Evolution and astronomy  are all meant to make us feel small and 
insignificant in their universe of  endless time and space.  The kingdom of god 
is within, not without.  God is  in our midst."    We should always be "open" I 
think Bernie, but "objective" at the same time.    Best wishes,    Steven.  


Bernie Brauer wrote:     Steven,
   
  So you could fire a LGM - 30 Minuteman III
  Intercontinental Ballistic Missile
  http://www.fas.org/nuke/guide/usa/icbm/lgm-30_3.htm
  at the sun and hit it?
   
  Then if we're always looking down at the sun it would
  always be daylight, unless it ducks behind something
  to give us a night-time?
   
  Just Asking,
  Bernie
   
  Steven Jones <steven@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
  Hi Bernie, me in blue:

Bernie Brauer wrote:     Steven,
   
  What are they saying is the diameter and circumference of 
  this concave Earth? Compared to 8,000 and 24,000 miles.
Amazingly, is the fact an earth circumference of 25,000 miles was first worked 
out from concave Earth experiments! Looking at the experimental data with more 
modern techniques of data analysis than the Morrow (concave Earth believers in 
the 19th century) team used, it has an uncertainty of a bit over 2%. Which is 
like the modern value by only about 2% also!

More here: http://www.lhup.edu/~dsimanek/hollow/morrow.htm (Look for "The 
Koreshan Geodetic Survey of 1897." title).
     
  If the sun is half way, then it would be placed at 4,000 miles.
5,000 I think is the official concave Earth estimate!
     
  Where are we standing? On the underside of a thin crust?
Well, yes, but it's not quite so thin as you imagine, between 150-500 miles 
think probably, and when you consider the worlds deepest mine is only 3.5 km 
(2.1 miles) deep, then it's thick. Interestingly, this is the limit also 
because it becomes molten at that depth. Holes dug simply seal over again.

Best wishes,

Steven.
     
  Kind Regards,
  Bernie

Steven Jones <steven@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
  Dear Jack, me in blue:

Jack Lewis wrote:   Dear Steven, 
I realise all that. How do they explain away geocentrism and all the other 
'isms? 

Jack 

Because, if it were proven that the Earth was concave and not convex, then life 
must be from within, that means that the cosmos or the starry heavens are 
within too as in the following diagram:



The universe doesn't exist, only the Earth and the starry globe within, it 
therefore becomes apparent that sun centred, Earth centred or whatever is 
irrelevant. This is probably one of the most beautiful aspects relating to the 
concave Earth hypothesis.

(Luke 17:21 KJV) "Neither shall they say, Lo here! or, lo there! for, behold, 
the kingdom of God is within you."

Thanks for the questions, it's appreciated to discuss this whilst I think about 
it all. If you have a question or a possible problem with the kinematics of 
this model, then fire-away and I'll attempt to answer it!

Best wishes,

Steven.


  
----- Original Message ----- From: "Steven Jones" <steven@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> 
To: <geocentrism@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> 
Sent: Monday, October 29, 2007 9:13 PM 
Subject: [geocentrism] Re: Concave model 


  Interesting question dear Jack, with the concave Earth, 
heliocentrism/acentrism/geocentrism, it's all irrelevant! The Earth is the 
nucleus of life if you like, you can forget other planets because it is only 
within the World that we live, shielded like in a womb from whatever lies 
beyond. If the concave Earth could be proven, it would be the end of it all. No 
more vast distances even, and a creator would be the most obvious thing ever. 

In support of the concave Earth: 

Question, why does a mercury leveled telescope looking out to sea with engraved 
central cross-hairs feature the ocean above the cross-hairs rather than at the 
centre or below? 

Interesting indeed.... 

Brotherly love, 

Steven. 




  __________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around 
http://mail.yahoo.com 


  __________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around 
http://mail.yahoo.com 


  __________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around 
http://mail.yahoo.com





  
---------------------------------
  National Bingo Night. Play along for the chance to win $10,000 every week. 
Download your gamecard now at Yahoo!7 TV. 

 __________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Tired of spam?  Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around 
http://mail.yahoo.com 

Other related posts: