[geocentrism] Re: Celestial Poles
- From: "Jack Lewis" <jack.lewis@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
- To: <geocentrism@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Sun, 25 Nov 2007 09:28:17 -0000
Dear Bernie,
Do you remember in one of my earlier e-mails I suggested that one argument at a
time be addressed until it is either proved or disproved or, as I believe in
this particular augment, is unresolved. As you say concisely below, it helps
neither model.
Jack
----- Original Message -----
From: Bernie Brauer
To: geocentrism@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Sent: Sunday, November 25, 2007 1:51 AM
Subject: [geocentrism] Re: Celestial Poles
"......the celestial poles argument does not disprove the heliocentric
model." N.T.J.
1 ......and the HC ecliptic pole and celestial pole arguments do not disprove
the Geocentric model.
2 "......the celestial poles argument does not disprove or prove the
heliocentric
model."
Bernie
Other related posts:
