[GeoStL] Re: rules, we don't need no rules …

  • From: "Mike Griffin" <brawnybear@xxxxxxxxx>
  • To: <geocaching@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
  • Date: Thu, 19 Jan 2012 09:45:30 -0600

LOL!!! I remember the ATV and gunpoint story! Crazy Geocachers crossing my 
land…….

 

Mike Griffin

Brawny Bear

St. Charles, MO

 

From: geocaching-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:geocaching-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx] 
On Behalf Of Glenn
Sent: January 19, 2012 9:23 AM
To: geocaching@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: [GeoStL] Re: rules, we don't need no rules …

 

True enough that but by the time I have figured out that a cache is just way 
stupid, I am way to far into "no mans land"  laying upside down in a ditch 
someplace. By that point I might as well sign the durn logbook and get the heck 
out before I get caught. The poor placement has already happened, I have 
already done it and who k ones who may have been approached in the past by this 
less then optimal placement. 

 

I guess I am a slow learner but by the point I am saying "just why the heck are 
we here?", it's too late. And no, the getting chased at gunpoint by a guy on an 
ATV was pretty much my fault. 😨 and we took the LONG way back to the car!  ouch 

Glenn 

Via iP-4

 


On Jan 19, 2012, at 8:54 AM, Maggie Madonia <letsride94@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:

Agreed but just like geocache placements common sense is not a requirement.  
That is where it defaults to me as the finder.
On Jan 19, 2012 8:50 AM, "Glenn" <gln.htc@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> Grandfathered!! I like that. 
>
> In the absence of rules common sense should prevail. 
>
> I really like the addition of the playground sentence.  
>
> Glenn 
> Via iP-4
>
>
> On Jan 19, 2012, at 8:29 AM, Maggie Madonia <letsride94@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
>> In defense of those you may deem rules broken...  they were placed before 
>> Munzee had "rules".
>>
>> On Thu, Jan 19, 2012 at 7:13 AM, <steve.bromley@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>>
>>> I wonder how many 'Munzee' deployers have actually read these rules? I've 
>>> seen a lot of these rules broken with some Munzee's.
>>>
>>> On , Glenn <GLNash@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>> > glad to see no one reads their rules either.   :-) 
>>> > 
>>> > Begin forwarded message:
>>> > 
>>> > Rules for placing a Munzee
>>> > Munzees must be placed according to (but not limited to) the following 
>>> > rules:A Munzee needs to be placed in a manner that promotes safe and 
>>> > reasonable gameplay.The placement of a munzee and the actions taken 
>>> > needing to capture it must not break any local, state or federal laws.A 
>>> > Munzee cannot be placed on private property without permission. This 
>>> > needs to be granted from the property representative or owner (not the 
>>> > barista*)A Munzee cannot be placed on airport property. Suspicious 
>>> > activity at an airport is going to be a problem.A Munzee cannot be placed 
>>> > within 500 feet of a municipal building, school, playground, pool, or 
>>> > memorial area.A Munzee needs to be placed a 'reasonable distance' away 
>>> > from other Munzees.There is not a currently a set rule, however it is a 
>>> > strong guideline. Over-saturation is no fun for anyone!Munzees cannot be 
>>> > located in the same place. No "bonus" hides allowed.Place your Munzee 
>>> > with respect to the local environment.
>>> > 
>>> > 
>>> > Glenn
>>> > 
>>> > 
>>> > 
>>> > 
>>> > 
>>> > 
>>> > 
>>> > 
>>> > 
>>> > 
>>> >
>>
>>

Other related posts: