[GeoStL] Re: [geocache] SLAGA Nominations
- From: "Tim and Pam" <timpam2mocachers@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- To: <geocaching@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Mon, 2 Jul 2007 17:47:22 -0500
-
There is absolutely nothing wrong with the Three Stogies!
I miss watching them.
Tim
www.tueltzen.smugmug.com
-----Original Message-----
From: geocaching-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
[mailto:geocaching-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Mike Griffin
Sent: Monday, July 02, 2007 5:44 PM
To: geocaching@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: [GeoStL] Re: [geocache] SLAGA Nominations
-
Thanks Tim, I was asking the same thing! :-P
I have one with the 3 Stooges. It is one of my favs!
----- Original Message -----
From: "Tim and Pam" <timpam2mocachers@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
To: <geocaching@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sent: Monday, July 02, 2007 4:43 PM
Subject: [GeoStL] Re: [geocache] SLAGA Nominations
> -
> What's wrong with fishing lures?
>
> Tim
>
> www.tueltzen.smugmug.com
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: geocaching-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
> [mailto:geocaching-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Stephen Martin
> Sent: Monday, July 02, 2007 4:39 PM
> To: geocaching@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Subject: [GeoStL] Re: [geocache] SLAGA Nominations
>
> -
> What if it is an ugly tie... like fishing lures or albert einstein with
> his
> tongue out. Will there be tie clips?
>
>
>
> On Monday, July 02, 2007, at 04:33PM, "Jim Bensman"
> <junkmailno@xxxxxxxxxxx>
> wrote:
>>-
>>And what happens if there is a tie vote when the Board votes to break the
>>tie? :) No need to answer, just laugh.
>>
>>Jim Bensman
>>"Nature Bats Last"
>>
>>> -----Original Message-----
>>> From: geocaching-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:geocaching-
>>> bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Steve Bromley
>>> Sent: Monday, July 02, 2007 2:59 PM
>>> To: geocaching@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
>>> Subject: [GeoStL] Re: [geocache] SLAGA Nominations
>>>
>>> -
>>> Bridget,
>>>
>>> Yes, in the case of a tie, the board gets to vote twice, but
>>> they only get to vote for the individuals that are "tied"
>>> for a vote. If five people run for a office and there is a
>>> tie between two of them for a position, we can only vote
>>> between those two, not for all five. I can see no reason to
>>> not let the "Board of Directors" vote since the likelyhood
>>> of a tie is extremely remote. Heck, last year, we only had
>>> one nominee for all but one of the positions.
>>>
>>> If you look at the US Constitution, if there is a tie for
>>> President, then the choice goes to the Electorial College
>>> and then to the House to vote and break it. In the same
>>> sense, they get to vote twice.
>>>
>>> If I came across as defensive, it wasn't meant to be. There
>>> just seemed to be a lot of discussion and questions on a set
>>> of by-laws that has been ratified and in effect for quite a
>>> while. If there are points that aren't clear, then they
>>> need to be discussed and if necessary, changed. That really
>>> needs to be done at one of the official meetings of SLAGA.
>>>
>>> I agree that it's hard to discuss things at a picnic where
>>> it's hard to hear but I'd wager that if we called a SLAGA
>>> business meeting that didn't involve eating, the attendance
>>> would be way down. :)
>>>
>>> Again, if I came across as defensive, then I appologize for
>>> that.
>>>
>>> Steve
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> ----- Original Message -----
>>> From: "Bridget E. Griffin" <Bridget.Griffin@xxxxxxxx>
>>> To: <geocaching@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>>> Subject: [GeoStL] Re: [geocache] SLAGA Nominations
>>> Date: Mon, 2 Jul 2007 13:08:10 -0500
>>>
>>> >-
>>> >So, in the case of a tie, the Board gets to vote twice.
>>> >
>>> >You know, no need to get on the defense. I don't think
>>> >anyone is "debating" anything. There are some things that
>>> >come up that just need clarification sometimes. It is a
>>> >little hard to talk about such things at a picnic where you
>>> >can't hear, etc.
>>> >
>>> >Again, just trying to clarify.
>>> >
>>> >Bridget
>>> >
>>> >-----Original Message-----
>>> >From: geocaching-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
>>> >[mailto:geocaching-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Steve
>>> >Bromley Sent: Monday, July 02, 2007 12:44 PM
>>> >To: geocaching@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
>>> >Subject: [GeoStL] Re: [geocache] SLAGA Nominations
>>> >
>>> >-
>>> >Nothing in the by-laws denies the Board of Directors or
>>> >"Officers" the ability to vote like any other member. In
>>> >the case of a tie, the "Board of Directories" gets to break
>>> >the tie. That's the way I interpret it any.
>>> >
>>> >If we want to debate the merits and technicalities of the
>>> >By-Laws, then I can put it on the 'agenda' for the fall
>>> >meeting. It may be my last official act as President (if
>>> >I'm not re-elected) since the transition of power happens
>>> >at the Fall Meeting.
>>> >
>>> >
>>> >----- Original Message -----
>>> >From: "Bridget E. Griffin" <Bridget.Griffin@xxxxxxxx>
>>> >To: <geocaching@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>>> >Subject: [GeoStL] Re: [geocache] SLAGA Nominations
>>> >Date: Mon, 2 Jul 2007 12:26:57 -0500
>>> >
>>> >>-
>>> >>Does this mean that the Board of Directors or "officers"
>>> >>are not allowed to vote, but only in the case of a
>>> >>tiebreaker?
>>> >>
>>> >>Bridget
>>> >>
>>> >>-----Original Message-----
>>> >>From: geocaching-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
>>> >>[mailto:geocaching-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Tim
>>> >>and Pam Sent: Monday, July 02, 2007 10:54 AM
>>> >>To: geocaching@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
>>> >>Subject: [GeoStL] Re: [geocache] SLAGA Nominations
>>> >>
>>> >>-
>>> >>From the bylaws:
>>> >>
>>> >>Section 5. Elections
>>> >>Board of Directors members are elected by members at the
>>> >>annual SLAGA Fall
>>> >>Picnic. In the event of a tie, the Board of Directors
>>> >>will serve as tiebreaker.
>>> >>
>>> >>
>>> >>Tim
>>> >>www.tueltzen.smugmug.com
>>> >>
>>> >>-----Original Message-----
>>> >>From: geocaching-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
>>> >>[mailto:geocaching-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Mike
>>> >>Griffin Sent: Monday, July 02, 2007 10:41 AM
>>> >>To: geocaching@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
>>> >>Subject: [GeoStL] Re: [geocache] SLAGA Nominations
>>> >>
>>> >>-
>>> >>August 31st?? Did the Bylaws change? I thought it was to
>>> >>be done at the Fall
>>> >>
>>> >>Picnic with absentee/electronic voting done prior. What
>>> >>happens if someone
>>> >>wants to vote at the picnic?
>>> >>
>>> >>Not stirring, Just simmering..
>>> >>
>>> >>Mike
>>> >>
>>> >>----- Original Message -----
>>> >>From: "Steve Bromley" <bromley@xxxxxxx>
>>> >>To: <geocaching@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>>> >>Sent: Monday, July 02, 2007 9:09 AM
>>> >>Subject: [GeoStL] Re: [geocache] SLAGA Nominations
>>> >>
>>> >>
>>> >>> -
>>> >>> Bridget,
>>> >>>
>>> >>> The nomiations were sent (or forwarded) to a GMail
>>> >>> address. The officers (for the most part) do not have
>>> >>> access to it. I do, but only to verify that my setup
>>> >>> worked and in case of emergency.
>>> >>>
>>> >>> We has asked Glenn to summarize the nominations and
>>> >>> report them to the officers. At that point, we will
>>> >>> contact each of the nominees to verify that they are
>>> >>> willing to serve. Once verified, they will be placed on
>>> >>> the ballot and then voting will begin. I'm guessing by
>>> >>> the 15th of July, but it might take a bit longer. In
>>> >>> any case, the election will be completed by August 31st.
>>> >>>
>>> >>> Steve
>>> >>>
>>> >>>
>>> >>> ----- Original Message -----
>>> >>> From: "Bridget E. Griffin" <Bridget.Griffin@xxxxxxxx>
>>> >>> To: <geocaching@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>>> >>> Subject: [GeoStL] Re: [geocache] SLAGA Nominations
>>> >>> Date: Mon, 2 Jul 2007 09:04:07 -0500
>>> >>>
>>> >>>>Who gathers the nominations and does the contacting? Is
>>> >>>>there a nominating committee?
>>> >>>>
>>> >>>>
>>> >>>>
>>> >>>>Just wondering.
>>> >>>>
>>> >>>>
>>> >>>>
>>> >>>>Bridget
>>> >>>>
>>> >>>>
>>> >>>>
>>> >>>>________________________________
>>> >>>>
>>> >>>>From: geocaching-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
>>> >>>>[mailto:geocaching-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of
>>> >>>>Steve Bromley Sent: Friday, June 29, 2007 10:06 PM
>>> >>>>To: geocaching@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
>>> >>>>Subject: [GeoStL] Re: [geocache] SLAGA Nominations
>>> >>>>
>>> >>>>
>>> >>>>
>>> >>>>Thank you Nancy. There have been nominations but as in
>>> >>>>a lot of things, "more is better". I wouldn't want
>>> >>>>anyone to think "I forgot to nomiate ......" so I'm just
>>> >>>>reminding everyone "One Last Time" to think of someone
>>> >>>>to nominate for a SLAGA representation.
>>> >>>>
>>> >>>>
>>> >>>>
>>> >>>>Voting will start once all the nominees have been
>>> >>>>contacted and have verified that they are willing to
>>> >>>>serve.
>>> >>>>
>>> >>>>
>>> >>>>Steve Bromley
>>> >>>>
>>> >>>>bromley@xxxxxxx
>>> >>>>
>>> >>>>
>>> >>>>
>>> >>>>
>>> >>>>
>>> >>>>
>>> >>>>
>>> >>>>
>>> >>>>
>>> >>>>
>>> >>>>________________________________
>>> >>>>
>>> >>>>
>>> >>>> From: geocaching-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
>>> >>>>[mailto:geocaching-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of
>>> >>>> tnsl Sent: 29 June 2007 Friday 9:54 PM
>>> >>>> To: Geocaching Freelist
>>> >>>> Subject: [geocache] [GeoStL] SLAGA Nominations
>>> >>>>
>>> >>>> Since the email for nominations has come out again
>>> >>>>.. does this mean that there are no nominations or that
>>> >>>>our President is doing a good job at communication
>>> >>>>(which, he is BTW).
>>> >>>>
>>> >>>>
>>> >>>>
>>> >>>> If anyone would like to be nominated for something
>>> >>>>and may be hesitant, let me know off list and I'd be
>>> >>>>glad to submit your nomination.
>>> >>>>
>>> >>>>
>>> >>>>
>>> >>>> Nancy
>>> >>>>
>>> >>>>
>>> >>>><http://i.msgtag.com/aqiqAihsr/iwurpyimzb/qBpcwCmaqCouw.
>>> >>>>>g if
>>> >>>>
>>> >>>>
>>> >>>
>>> >>> Steve
>>> >>>
>>> >>>
>>> >>> ****************************************
>>> >>> For List Info or To make _ANY_ changes, including
>>> >>unsubscribing from this
>>> >>> list, click ----->
>>> >>> //www.freelists.org/list/geocaching Missouri Caches
>>> >>> Scheduled to be Archived http://tinyurl.com/87cqw
>>> >>
>>> >>
>>> >>
>>> >> ****************************************
>>> >> For List Info or To make _ANY_ changes, including
>>> >>unsubscribing from this
>>> >> list, click ----->
>>> >>//www.freelists.org/list/geocaching
>>> >> Missouri Caches Scheduled to be Archived
>>> >>http://tinyurl.com/87cqw
>>> >>
>>> >>
>>> >>--
>>> >>No virus found in this incoming message.
>>> >>Checked by AVG.
>>> >>Version: 7.5.446 / Virus Database: 269.9.14/883 - Release
>>> >>Date: 7/1/2007 12:19 PM
>>> >>
>>> >>
>>> >>
>>> >> ****************************************
>>> >> For List Info or To make _ANY_ changes, including
>>> >>unsubscribing from this
>>> >> list, click ----->
>>> >>//www.freelists.org/list/geocaching
>>> >> Missouri Caches Scheduled to be Archived
>>> >>http://tinyurl.com/87cqw
>>> >>
>>> >>
>>> >>
>>> >>
>>> >> ****************************************
>>> >> For List Info or To make _ANY_ changes, including
>>> >>unsubscribing from this
>>> >> list, click ----->
>>> >>//www.freelists.org/list/geocaching
>>> >> Missouri Caches Scheduled to be Archived
>>> >>http://tinyurl.com/87cqw
>>> >
>>> >Steve
>>> >
>>> >
>>> > ****************************************
>>> > For List Info or To make _ANY_ changes, including
>>> >unsubscribing from this
>>> > list, click ----->
>>> >//www.freelists.org/list/geocaching
>>> > Missouri Caches Scheduled to be Archived
>>> >http://tinyurl.com/87cqw
>>> >
>>> >
>>> >
>>> >
>>> > ****************************************
>>> > For List Info or To make _ANY_ changes, including
>>> >unsubscribing from this
>>> > list, click ----->
>>> >//www.freelists.org/list/geocaching
>>> > Missouri Caches Scheduled to be Archived
>>> >http://tinyurl.com/87cqw
>>>
>>> Steve
>>>
>>>
>>> ****************************************
>>> For List Info or To make _ANY_ changes, including unsubscribing from
>>> this
>>> list, click -----> //www.freelists.org/list/geocaching
>>> Missouri Caches Scheduled to be Archived http://tinyurl.com/87cqw
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> ****************************************
>> For List Info or To make _ANY_ changes, including unsubscribing from this
>> list, click -----> //www.freelists.org/list/geocaching
>> Missouri Caches Scheduled to be Archived http://tinyurl.com/87cqw
>>
>>
>
>
> ****************************************
> For List Info or To make _ANY_ changes, including unsubscribing from this
> list, click -----> //www.freelists.org/list/geocaching
> Missouri Caches Scheduled to be Archived http://tinyurl.com/87cqw
>
>
> --
> No virus found in this incoming message.
> Checked by AVG.
> Version: 7.5.446 / Virus Database: 269.9.14/883 - Release Date: 7/1/2007
> 12:19 PM
>
>
>
>
> ****************************************
> For List Info or To make _ANY_ changes, including unsubscribing from this
> list, click -----> //www.freelists.org/list/geocaching
> Missouri Caches Scheduled to be Archived http://tinyurl.com/87cqw
>
****************************************
For List Info or To make _ANY_ changes, including unsubscribing from this
list, click -----> //www.freelists.org/list/geocaching
Missouri Caches Scheduled to be Archived http://tinyurl.com/87cqw
--
No virus found in this incoming message.
Checked by AVG.
Version: 7.5.446 / Virus Database: 269.9.14/883 - Release Date: 7/1/2007
12:19 PM
****************************************
For List Info or To make _ANY_ changes, including unsubscribing from this
list, click -----> //www.freelists.org/list/geocaching
Missouri Caches Scheduled to be Archived http://tinyurl.com/87cqw
Other related posts:
